Safety/risk assessment methodologies of deep geological facilities: Results from a cross-national comparison

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46356088%3A_____%2F14%3A%230001662" target="_blank" >RIV/46356088:_____/14:#0001662 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJGEI.2014.065530" target="_blank" >http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJGEI.2014.065530</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2014.065530" target="_blank" >10.1504/IJGEI.2014.065530</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Safety/risk assessment methodologies of deep geological facilities: Results from a cross-national comparison

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Any geological disposal/storage facility must prove its safe performance prior to licensing, regardless of whether the compound is solid radioactive waste (RW) or gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2). The disposal/storage facility is considered safe if it meetsthe relevant safety standards and proves its reliable safe performance over defined timescales. This paper presents a crossnational comparison of the safety/risk assessment aspects of ultimate disposal facilities for RW and CO2 in the Czech Republic, Switzerland, India, and Bulgaria, completed in an international project. In both fields, the main goal of safety assessments is to create a reliable evaluation of the disposal system performance over long timescales. The procedures are based on the following scheme: system description - system development description - model development - consequence analyses. Due to the long temporal and large spatial effects of the substances disposed of, a call for the introduction of a broader range of

Název v anglickém jazyce

Safety/risk assessment methodologies of deep geological facilities: Results from a cross-national comparison

Popis výsledku anglicky

Any geological disposal/storage facility must prove its safe performance prior to licensing, regardless of whether the compound is solid radioactive waste (RW) or gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2). The disposal/storage facility is considered safe if it meetsthe relevant safety standards and proves its reliable safe performance over defined timescales. This paper presents a crossnational comparison of the safety/risk assessment aspects of ultimate disposal facilities for RW and CO2 in the Czech Republic, Switzerland, India, and Bulgaria, completed in an international project. In both fields, the main goal of safety assessments is to create a reliable evaluation of the disposal system performance over long timescales. The procedures are based on the following scheme: system description - system development description - model development - consequence analyses. Due to the long temporal and large spatial effects of the substances disposed of, a call for the introduction of a broader range of

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DL - Jaderné odpady, radioaktivní znečištění a kontrola

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/FR-TI1%2F379" target="_blank" >FR-TI1/379: Výzkum a vývoj metod a technologií zachycování CO2 v elektrárnách na fosilní paliva a ukládání do geologických formací v podmínkách ČR</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International journal of global energy issues

ISSN

0954-7118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

26-51

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—