PATOČKA’S PHILOSOPHY OF ART AND CARE FOR THE SOUL

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46358978%3A_____%2F19%3A00000043" target="_blank" >RIV/46358978:_____/19:00000043 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-602-612" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-602-612</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-602-612" target="_blank" >10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-602-612</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

PATOČKA’S PHILOSOPHY OF ART AND CARE FOR THE SOUL

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Socratic theme of care for the soul expresses in Patočka’s late thought his desire to keep the understanding of human existence as a place of turn, metanoia, of struggle between authenticity and inauthenticity. Th is tendency not only goes against Heidegger and his late philosophy, but is also opposed to Patočka’s own earlier project of asubjective phenomenology as well. Th is essay argues, fi rstly, that the importance of subjectivity and existential dimension is still present in art and secondly, that art represents for Patočka sort of care for the soul. Th e argument has three stages. First, I demonstrate what Patočka means by soul or experience of soul and how we should understand the term ‘care.’ I argue that what Patočka understands under the concept of soul consists has freedom, krisis, and physis as its main features. Th e second part demonstrates that in Patočka’s view, these features are present in art. Th e last part compares art and philosophy as two kinds of care for the soul and demonstrates the limits of art as care of the soul. My conclusion is that art represents for Patočka a limited form of care for the soul compared to philosophy. However, according to Patočka, in current situation it is the only way of care for the soul that is left .

Název v anglickém jazyce

PATOČKA’S PHILOSOPHY OF ART AND CARE FOR THE SOUL

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Socratic theme of care for the soul expresses in Patočka’s late thought his desire to keep the understanding of human existence as a place of turn, metanoia, of struggle between authenticity and inauthenticity. Th is tendency not only goes against Heidegger and his late philosophy, but is also opposed to Patočka’s own earlier project of asubjective phenomenology as well. Th is essay argues, fi rstly, that the importance of subjectivity and existential dimension is still present in art and secondly, that art represents for Patočka sort of care for the soul. Th e argument has three stages. First, I demonstrate what Patočka means by soul or experience of soul and how we should understand the term ‘care.’ I argue that what Patočka understands under the concept of soul consists has freedom, krisis, and physis as its main features. Th e second part demonstrates that in Patočka’s view, these features are present in art. Th e last part compares art and philosophy as two kinds of care for the soul and demonstrates the limits of art as care of the soul. My conclusion is that art represents for Patočka a limited form of care for the soul compared to philosophy. However, according to Patočka, in current situation it is the only way of care for the soul that is left .

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

HORIZON / Studies in Phenomenology

ISSN

2226-5260

e-ISSN

2311-6986

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RU - Ruská federace

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

602-612

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85079112895