Ceramic 3d printing: Comparison of SLA and DLP technologies
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24210%2F20%3A00007714" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24210/20:00007714 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/46747885:24620/20:00007714
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mmscience.eu/journal/issues/june-2020/articles/ceramic-3d-printing-comparison-of-sla-and-dlp-technologies" target="_blank" >https://www.mmscience.eu/journal/issues/june-2020/articles/ceramic-3d-printing-comparison-of-sla-and-dlp-technologies</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2020_06_2020006" target="_blank" >10.17973/MMSJ.2020_06_2020006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Ceramic 3d printing: Comparison of SLA and DLP technologies
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Complex ceramic parts tend to be difficult or even impossible to produce by conventional methods. Therefore, the 3D printing technologies have started to spread widely in the area of ceramic parts production. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficiency of Stereolithography and Digital Light Processing technologies in 3D printing of ceramic parts. Firstly, indicative chemical analysis was performed on a chosen ceramic suspension. Secondly, sample parts of different shapes were designed and printed using both technologies. Next, printed samples were analyzed using thermogravimetric and optical analyses. Finally, printed parts were debound and sintered, and final ceramic parts were consequently re-analyzed. Both technologies show the best results in the printing of thin-walled and hollow models. The DLP was significantly faster, especially when the printing platform was close to full occupancy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Ceramic 3d printing: Comparison of SLA and DLP technologies
Popis výsledku anglicky
Complex ceramic parts tend to be difficult or even impossible to produce by conventional methods. Therefore, the 3D printing technologies have started to spread widely in the area of ceramic parts production. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficiency of Stereolithography and Digital Light Processing technologies in 3D printing of ceramic parts. Firstly, indicative chemical analysis was performed on a chosen ceramic suspension. Secondly, sample parts of different shapes were designed and printed using both technologies. Next, printed samples were analyzed using thermogravimetric and optical analyses. Finally, printed parts were debound and sintered, and final ceramic parts were consequently re-analyzed. Both technologies show the best results in the printing of thin-walled and hollow models. The DLP was significantly faster, especially when the printing platform was close to full occupancy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
MM Science Journal
ISSN
1803-1269
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2020
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
June
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
3905-3911
Kód UT WoS článku
000544190600007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85086231229