Accuracy Comparison of the Optical 3D Scanner and CT Scanner
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24210%2F20%3A00007874" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24210/20:00007874 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://journalmt.com/doi/10.21062/mft.2020.120.pdf" target="_blank" >http://journalmt.com/doi/10.21062/mft.2020.120.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21062/mft.2020.120" target="_blank" >10.21062/mft.2020.120</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Accuracy Comparison of the Optical 3D Scanner and CT Scanner
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Regarding the very dynamic development of the non-contact measurement methods, there has been observed still increasing number of their applications in various fields during the last years - not only in the engineering industry. E.g. from the dimensional quality point of view, knowledge of real 3D data of a given part is truly very important. There are several options for obtaining these data such as the usage of optical 3D digitization or computed tomography (CT). However, within the mutual comparability of such data, it is very important to know not only the accuracy of acquiring 3D data, but also e.g. possibilities of these systems in terms of own measurement. In the paper, a specially designed part containing various convex and concave shapes was measured by using two different systems (ATOS TripleScan optical 3D scanner and METROTOM 1500 G2 CT scanner). The resulting scanned models were then compared not only in terms of dimensional accuracy, but also in terms of quality and detail of the obtained data or the time required to prepare the measurement and its implementation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Accuracy Comparison of the Optical 3D Scanner and CT Scanner
Popis výsledku anglicky
Regarding the very dynamic development of the non-contact measurement methods, there has been observed still increasing number of their applications in various fields during the last years - not only in the engineering industry. E.g. from the dimensional quality point of view, knowledge of real 3D data of a given part is truly very important. There are several options for obtaining these data such as the usage of optical 3D digitization or computed tomography (CT). However, within the mutual comparability of such data, it is very important to know not only the accuracy of acquiring 3D data, but also e.g. possibilities of these systems in terms of own measurement. In the paper, a specially designed part containing various convex and concave shapes was measured by using two different systems (ATOS TripleScan optical 3D scanner and METROTOM 1500 G2 CT scanner). The resulting scanned models were then compared not only in terms of dimensional accuracy, but also in terms of quality and detail of the obtained data or the time required to prepare the measurement and its implementation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
21100 - Other engineering and technologies
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
ISSN
1213-2489
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
791-801
Kód UT WoS článku
000859946100013
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85104221391