Tools of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Used for Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24210%2F25%3A00012918" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24210/25:00012918 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010226" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010226</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr13010226" target="_blank" >10.3390/pr13010226</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Tools of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Used for Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

One of today’s great challenges is radical process improvement. TRIZ (theory of inventive problem solving) could help to resolve this. This study aims to answer the following research question: Which tool of TRIZ is best for process improvement? To answer this, a systematic literature review was conducted, and the gathered data were analyzed. The main focus was on the tools, the rate of improvement, the improved parameters, and the combination of tools. The results show that the technical contradiction with inventive principles should be easy to use and provide sufficient results. If the technical contradiction is not enough or the process is too complex, an algorithm or framework to use more advanced tools of TRIZ should be used. That should help to resolve the most challenging problems related to radical process improvement.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Tools of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Used for Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review

Popis výsledku anglicky

One of today’s great challenges is radical process improvement. TRIZ (theory of inventive problem solving) could help to resolve this. This study aims to answer the following research question: Which tool of TRIZ is best for process improvement? To answer this, a systematic literature review was conducted, and the gathered data were analyzed. The main focus was on the tools, the rate of improvement, the improved parameters, and the combination of tools. The results show that the technical contradiction with inventive principles should be easy to use and provide sufficient results. If the technical contradiction is not enough or the process is too complex, an algorithm or framework to use more advanced tools of TRIZ should be used. That should help to resolve the most challenging problems related to radical process improvement.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20401 - Chemical engineering (plants, products)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Processes>

ISSN

2227-9717

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001403834900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85215763104