Methodological Uncertainties in the Socioeconomic Analysis of Noise Abatement
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24220%2F15%3A%230003528" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24220/15:#0003528 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://icsv24.org/archives_icsv_last/2015_icsv22/content/papers/papers/full_paper_1228_20150330100926902.pdf" target="_blank" >http://icsv24.org/archives_icsv_last/2015_icsv22/content/papers/papers/full_paper_1228_20150330100926902.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Methodological Uncertainties in the Socioeconomic Analysis of Noise Abatement
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The impact of community noise pollution on health and wellbeing is a subject of public health policies and its economic impact is representing a burden for individuals as well as for the society. Since the main source of noise is traffic, the public actions are mainly focused on the traffic noise control arrangements. As a counterweight to the costs of these arrangements are financially expressed the changes in wellbeing and health of the affected inhabitants. This practice is known as Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) commonly with an emphasis on all stakeholders involvement. The input data for benefit calculations are: first from the models and later from the monitoring of changes in the level of noise and additionally from surveys among the affected inhabitants. The discrepancies in the results of objective measuring methods and subjective ability to perceive the change represent a source of uncertainties for the CBA. This effect can be observed from the data of community noise monitoring and surveys provided by National Institute of Public Health through the Subsystem III of the Environmental Health Monitoring system in the Czech Republic. Further the development of health valuation measures is provided as another source of uncertainties. The different sensitivity of psychological perception and technical monitoring in combination with uncertainties involved in economic valuation methods of changes in health are adding considerable uncertainties in the whole CBA concept and thus the economic emphasis in the justification process for the traffic noise abatement should be carefully interpreted.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Methodological Uncertainties in the Socioeconomic Analysis of Noise Abatement
Popis výsledku anglicky
The impact of community noise pollution on health and wellbeing is a subject of public health policies and its economic impact is representing a burden for individuals as well as for the society. Since the main source of noise is traffic, the public actions are mainly focused on the traffic noise control arrangements. As a counterweight to the costs of these arrangements are financially expressed the changes in wellbeing and health of the affected inhabitants. This practice is known as Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) commonly with an emphasis on all stakeholders involvement. The input data for benefit calculations are: first from the models and later from the monitoring of changes in the level of noise and additionally from surveys among the affected inhabitants. The discrepancies in the results of objective measuring methods and subjective ability to perceive the change represent a source of uncertainties for the CBA. This effect can be observed from the data of community noise monitoring and surveys provided by National Institute of Public Health through the Subsystem III of the Environmental Health Monitoring system in the Czech Republic. Further the development of health valuation measures is provided as another source of uncertainties. The different sensitivity of psychological perception and technical monitoring in combination with uncertainties involved in economic valuation methods of changes in health are adding considerable uncertainties in the whole CBA concept and thus the economic emphasis in the justification process for the traffic noise abatement should be carefully interpreted.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30304 - Public and environmental health
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration
ISBN
978-88-88942-48-3
ISSN
2329-3675
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
"neuvedeno"
Název nakladatele
International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration (IIAV)
Místo vydání
1418 Wiggins Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Místo konání akce
Florencie, Itálie
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2015
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000398997006073