Survey on the socio-economic and environmental impact of Wetland+®

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24310%2F24%3A00012322" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24310/24:00012322 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/46747885:24620/24:00012322

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571" target="_blank" >https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571" target="_blank" >10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7571</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Survey on the socio-economic and environmental impact of Wetland+®

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Sustainable remediation demonstrates that the benefit of undertaking remediation is more significant than its impact, and the optimum remediation solution is selected through a balanced decision-making process. Assessing sustainable remediation is site and project-specific and is strongly multifactorial across a wide range of categories, which may or may not be readily quantifiable. The applied socio-economic survey framework is based on the 2020 SuRF-UK guidance. The assessment was carried out in three steps. A small core team, an interim evaluation by the project of all beneficiaries, and a final assessment including the views of a broad range of external stakeholders developed an initial „pilot” sustainability assessment. The sustainability assessment process compared options across 45 individual criteria in 15 overarching „headline” categories: environmental, social, and economic. Members selected suitable criteria and the individual rankings of the project consortium from research, service providers and the site owner. The assessments compared Wetland+® with the WWTP and no-intervention scenario. Wetland+® outranked the use of WWTP, and both performed significantly better than the no-intervention scenario. The quantitative data from LCA confirmed the results devoted to environmental impact.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Survey on the socio-economic and environmental impact of Wetland+®

Popis výsledku anglicky

Sustainable remediation demonstrates that the benefit of undertaking remediation is more significant than its impact, and the optimum remediation solution is selected through a balanced decision-making process. Assessing sustainable remediation is site and project-specific and is strongly multifactorial across a wide range of categories, which may or may not be readily quantifiable. The applied socio-economic survey framework is based on the 2020 SuRF-UK guidance. The assessment was carried out in three steps. A small core team, an interim evaluation by the project of all beneficiaries, and a final assessment including the views of a broad range of external stakeholders developed an initial „pilot” sustainability assessment. The sustainability assessment process compared options across 45 individual criteria in 15 overarching „headline” categories: environmental, social, and economic. Members selected suitable criteria and the individual rankings of the project consortium from research, service providers and the site owner. The assessments compared Wetland+® with the WWTP and no-intervention scenario. Wetland+® outranked the use of WWTP, and both performed significantly better than the no-intervention scenario. The quantitative data from LCA confirmed the results devoted to environmental impact.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20701 - Environmental and geological engineering, geotechnics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Environmental Engineering

ISSN

0733-9372

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

150

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001247589300009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85195568373