Comparison of Two Different Principles of 3D Fabric Surface Reconstruction

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24410%2F16%3A00003649" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24410/16:00003649 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-89db88da-27aa-4ebc-b406-fa921145ddd1" target="_blank" >http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-89db88da-27aa-4ebc-b406-fa921145ddd1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/12303666.1215525" target="_blank" >10.5604/12303666.1215525</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Two Different Principles of 3D Fabric Surface Reconstruction

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper compares the efficiency of two different methods for a 3D fabric surface reconstruction with defects. The efficiency of the methods is evaluated according to the accuracy of 3D reconstruction, especially the detection of fabric defects and their respective characteristics. In this case, the defects of mean fabric pills. Pills are small balls of entangled fibers on top of a fabric surface, and they occur on every type of fabric. Using existing methods for objective pilling evaluation, many researchers have tried to find an effective procedure for the detection of pills in a fabric image. It is very important to obtain an accurate method for 3D sulfate reconstruction and the subsequent detection of pills. In the present study, the methods tested differ in the principle of creation of the 3D surface. The first method (method A) is called the gradient filed method, the principle of which is based on the use of the shadows of pills for 3D reconstruction. The second method (method B) uses non-contact laser profilometry for 3D surface reconstruction. A Talysurf CLI 500 instrument was used to trace the surface fabrics and to reconstruct the profile of the fabric surface. The results showed that method A should be more reliable for this purpose.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Two Different Principles of 3D Fabric Surface Reconstruction

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper compares the efficiency of two different methods for a 3D fabric surface reconstruction with defects. The efficiency of the methods is evaluated according to the accuracy of 3D reconstruction, especially the detection of fabric defects and their respective characteristics. In this case, the defects of mean fabric pills. Pills are small balls of entangled fibers on top of a fabric surface, and they occur on every type of fabric. Using existing methods for objective pilling evaluation, many researchers have tried to find an effective procedure for the detection of pills in a fabric image. It is very important to obtain an accurate method for 3D sulfate reconstruction and the subsequent detection of pills. In the present study, the methods tested differ in the principle of creation of the 3D surface. The first method (method A) is called the gradient filed method, the principle of which is based on the use of the shadows of pills for 3D reconstruction. The second method (method B) uses non-contact laser profilometry for 3D surface reconstruction. A Talysurf CLI 500 instrument was used to trace the surface fabrics and to reconstruct the profile of the fabric surface. The results showed that method A should be more reliable for this purpose.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

JS - Řízení spolehlivosti a kvality, zkušebnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE

ISSN

1230-3666

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

38-43

Kód UT WoS článku

000384960400006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84989339585