Comparative Estimation of Fiber Diameter of Nanofibrous Membranes by Image Analysis Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24410%2F18%3A00006317" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24410/18:00006317 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparative Estimation of Fiber Diameter of Nanofibrous Membranes by Image Analysis Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The manual methods are often used for measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun membranes, however these methods are not suitable for online quality control. Although number of image analysis methods have been reported for automated measurement of fiber diameter, but there is no literature available regarding reliability, accuracy and simplicity of these measurements. In this study, the distance transform methods suggested by Pourdeyhimi and Ziabari, direct tracking method, DiameterJ software and Zhang method were compared for automated measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun nanofibrous membranes. From one way ANOVA, the difference between the results of fiber diameter was found highly significant. The mean and standard deviation of fiber diameter obtained in case of Ziabari method were extremely close to the results of manual method and also to the true values of the simulated image. Therefore, the more accurate estimation of fiber diameter was confirmed in case of Ziabari method.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparative Estimation of Fiber Diameter of Nanofibrous Membranes by Image Analysis Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

The manual methods are often used for measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun membranes, however these methods are not suitable for online quality control. Although number of image analysis methods have been reported for automated measurement of fiber diameter, but there is no literature available regarding reliability, accuracy and simplicity of these measurements. In this study, the distance transform methods suggested by Pourdeyhimi and Ziabari, direct tracking method, DiameterJ software and Zhang method were compared for automated measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun nanofibrous membranes. From one way ANOVA, the difference between the results of fiber diameter was found highly significant. The mean and standard deviation of fiber diameter obtained in case of Ziabari method were extremely close to the results of manual method and also to the true values of the simulated image. Therefore, the more accurate estimation of fiber diameter was confirmed in case of Ziabari method.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20503 - Textiles; including synthetic dyes, colours, fibres (nanoscale materials to be 2.10; biomaterials to be 2.9)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Fibers and Polymers

ISSN

1229-9197

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

KR - Korejská republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

2612-2621

Kód UT WoS článku

000455239700021

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85059743688