Evaluation of User Performance in Interactive and Static 3D Maps.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F18%3A00006360" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/18:00006360 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00104238

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/7/11/415" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/7/11/415</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7110415" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijgi7110415</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluation of User Performance in Interactive and Static 3D Maps.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Interactive 3D visualizations of geospatial data are currently available and popular through various applications such as Google EarthTM and others. Several studies have focused on user performance with 3D maps, but static 3D maps were mostly used as stimuli. The main objective of this paper was to identify differences between interactive and static 3D maps. We also explored the role of different tasks and inter-individual differences of map users. In the experimental study, we analyzed effectiveness, efficiency, and subjective preferences, when working with static and interactive 3D maps. The study included 76 participants and used a within-subjects design. Experimental testing was performed using our own testing tool 3DmoveR 2.0, which was based on a user logging method and open web technologies. We demonstrated statistically significant differences between interactive and static 3D maps in effectiveness, efficiency, and subjective preferences. Interactivity influenced the results mainly in ‘spatial understanding’ and ‘combined’ tasks. From the identified differences, we concluded that the results of the user studies with static 3D maps as stimuli could not be transferred to interactive 3D visualizations or virtual reality.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluation of User Performance in Interactive and Static 3D Maps.

Popis výsledku anglicky

Interactive 3D visualizations of geospatial data are currently available and popular through various applications such as Google EarthTM and others. Several studies have focused on user performance with 3D maps, but static 3D maps were mostly used as stimuli. The main objective of this paper was to identify differences between interactive and static 3D maps. We also explored the role of different tasks and inter-individual differences of map users. In the experimental study, we analyzed effectiveness, efficiency, and subjective preferences, when working with static and interactive 3D maps. The study included 76 participants and used a within-subjects design. Experimental testing was performed using our own testing tool 3DmoveR 2.0, which was based on a user logging method and open web technologies. We demonstrated statistically significant differences between interactive and static 3D maps in effectiveness, efficiency, and subjective preferences. Interactivity influenced the results mainly in ‘spatial understanding’ and ‘combined’ tasks. From the identified differences, we concluded that the results of the user studies with static 3D maps as stimuli could not be transferred to interactive 3D visualizations or virtual reality.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10508 - Physical geography

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTACH17002" target="_blank" >LTACH17002: Dynamické mapovací metody orientované na řízení rizik a katastrof v éře velkých dat</a><br>

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION

ISSN

2220-9964

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

1-25

Kód UT WoS článku

000451313900002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85058021500