Choosing The Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model For Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24510%2F24%3A00012657" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24510/24:00012657 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41330/24:100309

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2024EA003743" target="_blank" >https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2024EA003743</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003743" target="_blank" >10.1029/2024EA003743</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Choosing The Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model For Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Satellite-derived global digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for providing the topographic information needed in a wide range of hydrological applications. However, their use is limited by spatial resolution and vertical bias due to sensor limitations in observing bare terrain. Significant efforts have been made to improve the resolution of global DEMs (e.g., TanDEM-X) and create bare-earth DEMs (e.g., FABDEM, MERIT, CEDTM). We evaluated the vertical accuracy of bare-earth and global DEMs in Central European mountains and submontane regions, and assessed how DEM resolution, vegetation offset removal, land cover, and terrain slope affect stream network delineation. Using lidar-derived DTM and national stream networks as references, we found that: (a) bare-earth DEMs outperform global DEMs across all land cover types. RMSEs increased with increasing slope for all DEMs in non-forest areas. In forests, however, the negative effect of the slope was outweighed by the vegetation offset even for bare-earth DTMs; (b) the accuracy of derived stream networks was affected by terrain slope and land cover more than by the vertical accuracy of DEMs. Stream network delineation performed poorly in non-forest areas and relatively well in forests. Increasing slope improved the streams delineation performance; (c) using DEMs with higher resolution (e.g., 12 m TanDEM-X) improved stream network delineation, but increasing resolution also increased the need for effective vegetation bias removal. Our results indicate that vertical accuracy alone does not reflect how well DEMs perform in stream network delineation. This underscores the need to include stream network performance in DEM quality rankings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Choosing The Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model For Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Satellite-derived global digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for providing the topographic information needed in a wide range of hydrological applications. However, their use is limited by spatial resolution and vertical bias due to sensor limitations in observing bare terrain. Significant efforts have been made to improve the resolution of global DEMs (e.g., TanDEM-X) and create bare-earth DEMs (e.g., FABDEM, MERIT, CEDTM). We evaluated the vertical accuracy of bare-earth and global DEMs in Central European mountains and submontane regions, and assessed how DEM resolution, vegetation offset removal, land cover, and terrain slope affect stream network delineation. Using lidar-derived DTM and national stream networks as references, we found that: (a) bare-earth DEMs outperform global DEMs across all land cover types. RMSEs increased with increasing slope for all DEMs in non-forest areas. In forests, however, the negative effect of the slope was outweighed by the vegetation offset even for bare-earth DTMs; (b) the accuracy of derived stream networks was affected by terrain slope and land cover more than by the vertical accuracy of DEMs. Stream network delineation performed poorly in non-forest areas and relatively well in forests. Increasing slope improved the streams delineation performance; (c) using DEMs with higher resolution (e.g., 12 m TanDEM-X) improved stream network delineation, but increasing resolution also increased the need for effective vegetation bias removal. Our results indicate that vertical accuracy alone does not reflect how well DEMs perform in stream network delineation. This underscores the need to include stream network performance in DEM quality rankings.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Earth and Space Science

ISSN

2333-5084

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001369866000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85210474916