Letter to the Editor: Severity of elbow mobility limitation in pediatric patients with a displaced supracondylar humerus fracture requiring surgical treatment-A monocentric retrospective clinical study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F46747885%3A24530%2F25%3A00014642" target="_blank" >RIV/46747885:24530/25:00014642 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40458207/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40458207/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521251389409" target="_blank" >10.1177/18632521251389409</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Letter to the Editor: Severity of elbow mobility limitation in pediatric patients with a displaced supracondylar humerus fracture requiring surgical treatment-A monocentric retrospective clinical study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Purpose: It was aimed to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between various types of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with movement impairment according to Flynn‘s classification. Methods: Clinical results of 263 patients who were operated on with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus were evaluated. Flynn‘s classification was used to compare movement impairment. Results: One year after the procedure, only one patient in the category of extension fractures of type II displacement, and only in elbow flexion, had an unsatisfactory treatment outcome according to Flynn. All other patients achieved a satisfactory treatment outcome, with the vast majority, 252 patients (96%), in the excellent category. Four patients were in the good category, one patient in the fair category, and the aforementioned one patient in the poor category. Conclusion: In 1 year after the surgery, the limitation of elbow mobility is usually insignificant regardless of the grade of displacement or type of supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective comparative study.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Letter to the Editor: Severity of elbow mobility limitation in pediatric patients with a displaced supracondylar humerus fracture requiring surgical treatment-A monocentric retrospective clinical study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Purpose: It was aimed to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between various types of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with movement impairment according to Flynn‘s classification. Methods: Clinical results of 263 patients who were operated on with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus were evaluated. Flynn‘s classification was used to compare movement impairment. Results: One year after the procedure, only one patient in the category of extension fractures of type II displacement, and only in elbow flexion, had an unsatisfactory treatment outcome according to Flynn. All other patients achieved a satisfactory treatment outcome, with the vast majority, 252 patients (96%), in the excellent category. Four patients were in the good category, one patient in the fair category, and the aforementioned one patient in the poor category. Conclusion: In 1 year after the surgery, the limitation of elbow mobility is usually insignificant regardless of the grade of displacement or type of supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective comparative study.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30211 - Orthopaedics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS>
ISSN
1863-2521
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
19
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
001604758600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—