DOES THE NAME MATTER? CENTRAL EUROPE AND CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE IN DIFFERENT VARIATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLISH AND CZECH DISCOURSES
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19510%2F18%3AA0000191" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19510/18:A0000191 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://search.proquest.com/openview/3835fed515dd51fadc749282acb86a45/1?cbl=2030181&pq-origsite=gscholar" target="_blank" >https://search.proquest.com/openview/3835fed515dd51fadc749282acb86a45/1?cbl=2030181&pq-origsite=gscholar</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.57.13" target="_blank" >10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.57.13</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
DOES THE NAME MATTER? CENTRAL EUROPE AND CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE IN DIFFERENT VARIATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLISH AND CZECH DISCOURSES
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article points at differences and similarities in ways of defining Central Europe and Central-Eastern Europe found in Polish and Czech academic discourse. The aim of the article is, firstly, to identify these differences and similarities, and secondly, to indicate the probable reasons for their existence. In order to accomplish both goals, the authors analyze selected narratives of Czech and Polish historiography and the terms present in both kinds of discourse under analysis. The analysis is based on a selection of texts considered relevant and influential. The time span covered in the article is the period from the First World War to the present times, with particular emphasis on the period from the 1970s onwards. In spatial terms, the article focuses on influential Polish and Czech authors working either in their home countries or abroad, as émigrés. The object of study is discourse understood as a communication activity in which meanings are continuously constructed. The article takes into consideration the following issues: (1) the popularity of the notions of “Central Europe” and “Central-Eastern Europe” in both discourses; (2) the evaluation of these concepts - namely the attribution of some positive and negative features to them; (3) the presentation of the topoi of Central Europe and Central-Eastern Europe in Polish and Czech discourses (the views concerning their spatial extent and borders); (4) political operationalization of these concepts in the form of integration (geopolitical) projects.
Název v anglickém jazyce
DOES THE NAME MATTER? CENTRAL EUROPE AND CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE IN DIFFERENT VARIATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLISH AND CZECH DISCOURSES
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article points at differences and similarities in ways of defining Central Europe and Central-Eastern Europe found in Polish and Czech academic discourse. The aim of the article is, firstly, to identify these differences and similarities, and secondly, to indicate the probable reasons for their existence. In order to accomplish both goals, the authors analyze selected narratives of Czech and Polish historiography and the terms present in both kinds of discourse under analysis. The analysis is based on a selection of texts considered relevant and influential. The time span covered in the article is the period from the First World War to the present times, with particular emphasis on the period from the 1970s onwards. In spatial terms, the article focuses on influential Polish and Czech authors working either in their home countries or abroad, as émigrés. The object of study is discourse understood as a communication activity in which meanings are continuously constructed. The article takes into consideration the following issues: (1) the popularity of the notions of “Central Europe” and “Central-Eastern Europe” in both discourses; (2) the evaluation of these concepts - namely the attribution of some positive and negative features to them; (3) the presentation of the topoi of Central Europe and Central-Eastern Europe in Polish and Czech discourses (the views concerning their spatial extent and borders); (4) political operationalization of these concepts in the form of integration (geopolitical) projects.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50701 - Cultural and economic geography
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Politeja
ISSN
1733-6716
e-ISSN
2391-6737
Svazek periodika
57
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
27
Strana od-do
231-257
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—