On the analytic hierarchy process with conflicting criteria

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F13%3A%230002184" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/13:#0002184 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the analytic hierarchy process with conflicting criteria

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by T. L. Saaty elements from one hierarchical level (such as alternatives) are pair-wise compared with regard to each element from immediately higher level of hierarchy (e.g. by criteria) on 1-9 scale. Bythis procedure weights of criteria are established by the eigenvalue method and the best alternative is found with regard to a given goal. However, in real-world multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems some criterion might be in conflict withother criteria, but this problem is completely neglected in the standard AHP. The aim of the article is to propose a new method for the evaluation of criteria weights based both on their pair-wise comparisons and the degree of a conflict/agreement amongcriteria. This degree for each pair of alternatives is expressed by a value from [-1,1] interval, where positive values denote an agreement, while negative values denote a conflict, and all the degrees form a conflict matrix. Information

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the analytic hierarchy process with conflicting criteria

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by T. L. Saaty elements from one hierarchical level (such as alternatives) are pair-wise compared with regard to each element from immediately higher level of hierarchy (e.g. by criteria) on 1-9 scale. Bythis procedure weights of criteria are established by the eigenvalue method and the best alternative is found with regard to a given goal. However, in real-world multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems some criterion might be in conflict withother criteria, but this problem is completely neglected in the standard AHP. The aim of the article is to propose a new method for the evaluation of criteria weights based both on their pair-wise comparisons and the degree of a conflict/agreement amongcriteria. This degree for each pair of alternatives is expressed by a value from [-1,1] interval, where positive values denote an agreement, while negative values denote a conflict, and all the degrees form a conflict matrix. Information

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA402%2F09%2F0405" target="_blank" >GA402/09/0405: Rozvoj nestandardních optimalizačních metod a jejich aplikace v ekonomii a managementu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics 2013

ISBN

978-80-87035-76-4

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

600-605

Název nakladatele

Vysoká škola polytechnická Jihlava

Místo vydání

Jihlava

Místo konání akce

Jihlava

Datum konání akce

11. 9. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—