Angresano criteria as one of the evaluation possibilities of the economic level: Case of the North Africa countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F14%3A%230002715" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/14:#0002715 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Angresano criteria as one of the evaluation possibilities of the economic level: Case of the North Africa countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the comparison of the economic level of the six North African countries on the basis of macroeconomic indicators set by James Angresano, in the years 2007 to 2011. Given the scale of Angresano criteria, only some of states in thisregion were selected; South Sudan was excluded from the comparison, since it was only founded in 2011. The aim of the article is based on above criteria by comparison to determine whether the economic level of the economies is fundamentally different ornot. Hypothesis about the level of economic diversity was formulated, which was confirmed on the basis of the examined criteria. In addition to the comparative method, the article also used the methods of description and analysis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Angresano criteria as one of the evaluation possibilities of the economic level: Case of the North Africa countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the comparison of the economic level of the six North African countries on the basis of macroeconomic indicators set by James Angresano, in the years 2007 to 2011. Given the scale of Angresano criteria, only some of states in thisregion were selected; South Sudan was excluded from the comparison, since it was only founded in 2011. The aim of the article is based on above criteria by comparison to determine whether the economic level of the economies is fundamentally different ornot. Hypothesis about the level of economic diversity was formulated, which was confirmed on the basis of the examined criteria. In addition to the comparative method, the article also used the methods of description and analysis.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

WSEAS Transaction on Business and Economics

ISSN

1109-9526

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GR - Řecká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

582-591

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—