REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ITS MEASUREMENT IN VISEGRAD GROUP COUNTRIES
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F18%3A00011079" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/18:00011079 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ITS MEASUREMENT IN VISEGRAD GROUP COUNTRIES
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of the paper is to measure regional development and construct an index for the Visegrad Group countries at NUTS 2 level. This index, called the Regional Development Index - the RDI - is created as an extension of the Human Development Index in order to obtain a better composed index at regional level. Twelve socio-economic indicators are selected for this purpose: three economic indicators, three educational indicators, three health variables and three indicators of the standard of living which create four dimensions. These variables are tested for their reliability through the pairwise correlation and the min-max method is used for the construction of the index. The data are compared between 2008 and 2013 and the assumption about worsening the situation in regions after the crisis is set. The results show that the values of the RDI improved in nearly all regions (with the exception of Prague in the Czech Republic and Kozep-Magyarorszag in Hungary) in the monitored years. The a ssumption that regional development was negatively influenced by economic crisis has not been confirmed.
Název v anglickém jazyce
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ITS MEASUREMENT IN VISEGRAD GROUP COUNTRIES
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of the paper is to measure regional development and construct an index for the Visegrad Group countries at NUTS 2 level. This index, called the Regional Development Index - the RDI - is created as an extension of the Human Development Index in order to obtain a better composed index at regional level. Twelve socio-economic indicators are selected for this purpose: three economic indicators, three educational indicators, three health variables and three indicators of the standard of living which create four dimensions. These variables are tested for their reliability through the pairwise correlation and the min-max method is used for the construction of the index. The data are compared between 2008 and 2013 and the assumption about worsening the situation in regions after the crisis is set. The results show that the values of the RDI improved in nearly all regions (with the exception of Prague in the Czech Republic and Kozep-Magyarorszag in Hungary) in the monitored years. The a ssumption that regional development was negatively influenced by economic crisis has not been confirmed.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
DETUROPE-THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM
ISSN
1821-2506
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CS - Srbsko a Černá Hora
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
17-37
Kód UT WoS článku
000447626600002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—