Belligerent Reprisals in Non-International Armed Conflicts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F14%3A%230001352" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/14:#0001352 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002058931300047X" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002058931300047X</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002058931300047X" target="_blank" >10.1017/S002058931300047X</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Belligerent Reprisals in Non-International Armed Conflicts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper offers the first comprehensive treatment of the applicability and regulation of belligerent reprisals in non-international armed conflicts. It introduces three approaches to the topic (extralegal, permissive and restrictive approaches) which all enjoy some support among States and scholars. The paper shows that international humanitarian law (IHL) treaties, IHL customs and other legal sources do not make it possible to decide between these approaches, as they are either silent on the topic orallow for several interpretations. It is the assessment of extralegal considerations and of the general framework of IHL which allows us to conclude that belligerent reprisals are inapplicable in non-international armed conflicts (extralegal approach). Yet, there are signs indicating that a gradual shift toward the restrictive approach could be under way. The paper cautions against a premature acceptance of this approach drawing attention to its limits.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Belligerent Reprisals in Non-International Armed Conflicts

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper offers the first comprehensive treatment of the applicability and regulation of belligerent reprisals in non-international armed conflicts. It introduces three approaches to the topic (extralegal, permissive and restrictive approaches) which all enjoy some support among States and scholars. The paper shows that international humanitarian law (IHL) treaties, IHL customs and other legal sources do not make it possible to decide between these approaches, as they are either silent on the topic orallow for several interpretations. It is the assessment of extralegal considerations and of the general framework of IHL which allows us to conclude that belligerent reprisals are inapplicable in non-international armed conflicts (extralegal approach). Yet, there are signs indicating that a gradual shift toward the restrictive approach could be under way. The paper cautions against a premature acceptance of this approach drawing attention to its limits.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International and Comparative Law Quarterly

ISSN

0020-5893

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

63

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

35

Strana od-do

31-65

Kód UT WoS článku

000332938200002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—