Czech metaphors about Europe: Havel vs Klaus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F15%3A%230001440" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/15:#0001440 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.11" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.11</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.11" target="_blank" >10.1057/jird.2014.11</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Czech metaphors about Europe: Havel vs Klaus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the cleavage inside the Czech political elite regarding the Czech position on the European Union (EU). The cleavage is analysed by exploring the metaphors which two prominent political leaders, Havel and Klaus, used when they spoke about the EU. It is argued that the metaphors that were embraced by the former tended to be rejected by the latter and that Klaus spoke about the EU in increasingly negative terms. The study of the metaphors used in their texts and speeches elucidatesnot only the clash between the two politicians visions of Europe but also the nature of the split between two fundamental positions found on the Czech political scene. It is argued that the split goes back to the political debates in the early 1990s. Havel, who supported the idea of a European federation frequently, used metaphors that provided an image of a coherent whole and a unitary actor. On the other side, Klaus scepticism towards European integration and unification corresponds wi

Název v anglickém jazyce

Czech metaphors about Europe: Havel vs Klaus

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the cleavage inside the Czech political elite regarding the Czech position on the European Union (EU). The cleavage is analysed by exploring the metaphors which two prominent political leaders, Havel and Klaus, used when they spoke about the EU. It is argued that the metaphors that were embraced by the former tended to be rejected by the latter and that Klaus spoke about the EU in increasingly negative terms. The study of the metaphors used in their texts and speeches elucidatesnot only the clash between the two politicians visions of Europe but also the nature of the split between two fundamental positions found on the Czech political scene. It is argued that the split goes back to the political debates in the early 1990s. Havel, who supported the idea of a European federation frequently, used metaphors that provided an image of a coherent whole and a unitary actor. On the other side, Klaus scepticism towards European integration and unification corresponds wi

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GPP408%2F12%2FP905" target="_blank" >GPP408/12/P905: Česká politika v EU ve světle teorie rolí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of International Relations and Development

ISSN

1408-6980

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

532-555

Kód UT WoS článku

000362626200007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84941686942