Stuck on disarmament: the European Union and the 2015 NPT Review Conference

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000035" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/16:N0000035 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11230/16:10315713

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/ia/stuck-disarmament-european-union-and-2015-npt-review-Conference" target="_blank" >https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/ia/stuck-disarmament-european-union-and-2015-npt-review-Conference</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12510" target="_blank" >10.1111/1468-2346.12510</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Stuck on disarmament: the European Union and the 2015 NPT Review Conference

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The quinquennial Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference represents a highly important event from the perspective of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Though not a party to the treaty itself, the EU has made a consistent effort since the 1990s to coordinate the positions of its member states and achieve higher visibility in the NPT review process. The aim of this article is to examine the role of the EU in the 2015 NPT Review Conference deliberations. Drawing on on-site observations, statements and in-depth research interviews, it argues that the recent institutional changes notwithstanding, the influence of the EU as a distinct actor in the NPT context remains very limited, and the EU’s common position is in bigger disarray than ever before. This year’s Review Conference demonstrated the widening rift between the member states, in particular in the area of nuclear disarmament and the related issues. The inability to maintain a coherent common position limits the EU ‘actorness’ and impedes its striving for relevance in the NPT forums. The dynamics outlined in this article further highlight the limits of the EU CFSP in security matters in which the national positions of individual member states are as divergent as in the case of nuclear disarmament.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Stuck on disarmament: the European Union and the 2015 NPT Review Conference

Popis výsledku anglicky

The quinquennial Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference represents a highly important event from the perspective of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Though not a party to the treaty itself, the EU has made a consistent effort since the 1990s to coordinate the positions of its member states and achieve higher visibility in the NPT review process. The aim of this article is to examine the role of the EU in the 2015 NPT Review Conference deliberations. Drawing on on-site observations, statements and in-depth research interviews, it argues that the recent institutional changes notwithstanding, the influence of the EU as a distinct actor in the NPT context remains very limited, and the EU’s common position is in bigger disarray than ever before. This year’s Review Conference demonstrated the widening rift between the member states, in particular in the area of nuclear disarmament and the related issues. The inability to maintain a coherent common position limits the EU ‘actorness’ and impedes its striving for relevance in the NPT forums. The dynamics outlined in this article further highlight the limits of the EU CFSP in security matters in which the national positions of individual member states are as divergent as in the case of nuclear disarmament.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Affairs

ISSN

0020-5850

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

92

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

137-152

Kód UT WoS článku

000367828400008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84953868627