Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Symbols of illiberalism in the world of liberal states

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000100" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/16:N0000100 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.brill.com/products/reference-work/baltic-yearbook-international-law-volume-15-2015" target="_blank" >http://www.brill.com/products/reference-work/baltic-yearbook-international-law-volume-15-2015</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Symbols of illiberalism in the world of liberal states

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Liberal democracies, by their very nature, shall be tolerant and open to diverse views and opinions. Should, however, tolerance and openness extend to illiberal ideas and to symbols of illiberal ideologies and regimes? While the first part of the question has received an extensive coverage in the academic literature, the second has passed largely undiscussed. The recent attempts by several countries of Central and Eastern Europe to ban the use of certain political symbols show however how topical the issue is. The prohibition of symbols of illiberal ideologies or regimes could be addressed from various perspectives. The current chapter discusses it in light of the main normative system applicable in liberal democracies, that of international human rights law and, primarily, the European Convention on Human Rights. Drawing upon the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and upon national legal acts and court decisions from several Central and Eastern European countries (section 1), the chapter shows that the European Convention makes it possible for States to outlaw the public use of illiberal symbols (section 2). The legal regulation needs however to fulfil the classical criteria of lawful restrictions of human rights – legality, legitimacy, and necessity in a democratic society (section 2.1). The paper argues that when limiting the use of political symbols, States should also take into account the presence or absence of social consensus on the interpretation of a certain symbol and the overall purpose of the restriction. So far, these factors have been largely neglected both at the national and at the European level (section 2.2).

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Symbols of illiberalism in the world of liberal states

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Liberal democracies, by their very nature, shall be tolerant and open to diverse views and opinions. Should, however, tolerance and openness extend to illiberal ideas and to symbols of illiberal ideologies and regimes? While the first part of the question has received an extensive coverage in the academic literature, the second has passed largely undiscussed. The recent attempts by several countries of Central and Eastern Europe to ban the use of certain political symbols show however how topical the issue is. The prohibition of symbols of illiberal ideologies or regimes could be addressed from various perspectives. The current chapter discusses it in light of the main normative system applicable in liberal democracies, that of international human rights law and, primarily, the European Convention on Human Rights. Drawing upon the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and upon national legal acts and court decisions from several Central and Eastern European countries (section 1), the chapter shows that the European Convention makes it possible for States to outlaw the public use of illiberal symbols (section 2). The legal regulation needs however to fulfil the classical criteria of lawful restrictions of human rights – legality, legitimacy, and necessity in a democratic society (section 2.1). The paper argues that when limiting the use of political symbols, States should also take into account the presence or absence of social consensus on the interpretation of a certain symbol and the overall purpose of the restriction. So far, these factors have been largely neglected both at the national and at the European level (section 2.2).

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

    AG - Právní vědy

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Baltic Yearbook of International Law

  • ISBN

    978-90-04-32974-4

  • Počet stran výsledku

    19

  • Strana od-do

    249-267

  • Počet stran knihy

    642

  • Název nakladatele

    Brill

  • Místo vydání

    Leiden

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly