The use of force against the Islamic State (Jus ad bellum aspects)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000008" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/17:N0000008 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-8-2017/254/" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-8-2017/254/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The use of force against the Islamic State (Jus ad bellum aspects)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper assesses the legality of the use of force against the Islamic State (IS). It first demonstrates that the IS, despite its name, is not a State but, rather, an armed non-state actor. It then gives a short factual background on the military interventions against the IS and on the regulation applicable to the use of force under current international law. In the third step, the paper discusses, one by one, all the different legal grounds that have been invoked, by intervening States or by scholars, to justify the military interventions against the IS (UN collective actions, intervention by invitation, self-defence and humanitarian intervention). The paper demonstrates that whereas some of these interventions can be legally justified (the US in Iraq, Russia in Syria), the legality of others (Turkey in Iraq, the US in Syria) is questionable, either because the legal grounds provided for them are not generally accepted as valid, or because the application of these grounds in this case at hand gives rise to doubts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The use of force against the Islamic State (Jus ad bellum aspects)

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper assesses the legality of the use of force against the Islamic State (IS). It first demonstrates that the IS, despite its name, is not a State but, rather, an armed non-state actor. It then gives a short factual background on the military interventions against the IS and on the regulation applicable to the use of force under current international law. In the third step, the paper discusses, one by one, all the different legal grounds that have been invoked, by intervening States or by scholars, to justify the military interventions against the IS (UN collective actions, intervention by invitation, self-defence and humanitarian intervention). The paper demonstrates that whereas some of these interventions can be legally justified (the US in Iraq, Russia in Syria), the legality of others (Turkey in Iraq, the US in Syria) is questionable, either because the legal grounds provided for them are not generally accepted as valid, or because the application of these grounds in this case at hand gives rise to doubts.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2017

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

235-258

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041023243