Comparing global security regimes: a power-analytical synthesis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000003" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/18:N0000003 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0089-x" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41311-017-0089-x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0089-x" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41311-017-0089-x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparing global security regimes: a power-analytical synthesis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this article is to offer a synthesis of what is termed here a power-analytical approach to global security regimes. The considered and prominent cases of prohibition/regulatory security regimes fall into three security clusters: a humanitarian cluster (small arms and light weapons, anti-personnel landmines, and cluster munitions), a WMD cluster (chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons), and an “unconventional” cluster (drugs and cyber weapons). Drawing on the thorough theoretical and empirical approach, the following synthesis is structured—and regimes compared—along four major categories. These four categories have been distilled from the power-analytical approach and empirical workings of the respective regimes. They are: perennial relevance of productive power; contingent systems of differentiation; real/imagined military/security centrality; and manipulation of categories. Importantly, they allow us to capture the most prominent features among the rich variety of cases. Therefore, they are reflective of both conceptual vocabulary and the multiple empirical realities of the examined regimes, thus greatly contributing not only to the existing, yet piecemeal regimes theorisation but also to empirical variability across the board.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparing global security regimes: a power-analytical synthesis

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this article is to offer a synthesis of what is termed here a power-analytical approach to global security regimes. The considered and prominent cases of prohibition/regulatory security regimes fall into three security clusters: a humanitarian cluster (small arms and light weapons, anti-personnel landmines, and cluster munitions), a WMD cluster (chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons), and an “unconventional” cluster (drugs and cyber weapons). Drawing on the thorough theoretical and empirical approach, the following synthesis is structured—and regimes compared—along four major categories. These four categories have been distilled from the power-analytical approach and empirical workings of the respective regimes. They are: perennial relevance of productive power; contingent systems of differentiation; real/imagined military/security centrality; and manipulation of categories. Importantly, they allow us to capture the most prominent features among the rich variety of cases. Therefore, they are reflective of both conceptual vocabulary and the multiple empirical realities of the examined regimes, thus greatly contributing not only to the existing, yet piecemeal regimes theorisation but also to empirical variability across the board.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA13-26485S" target="_blank" >GA13-26485S: Globální prohibiční režimy: Rozvoj teorie a empirická analýza</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Politics

ISSN

1384-5748

e-ISSN

1740-3898

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

503-517

Kód UT WoS článku

000445907200012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85033674838