A Quantifiable Approach to the Selection of Criteria and Indexation for Comparison of the Gas Pipeline Projects Leading to the EU : Diversification Rationality against Securitisation?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000012" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/21:N0000012 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61384399:31120/21:00056334

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544221004874?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544221004874?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120238" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.energy.2021.120238</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Quantifiable Approach to the Selection of Criteria and Indexation for Comparison of the Gas Pipeline Projects Leading to the EU : Diversification Rationality against Securitisation?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The EU is dependent on imports of natural gas, and it has followed the issue of energy security and the need to diversify suppliers. Its political discourse clearly shows a preference for reducing its dependence on Russia, even if it is necessary to incur high costs in order to do so. It turns out, however, that the possibilities for diversification are limited and the reality of the new projects may contradict it. The article identifies the economic and political criteria for the comparison of the gas pipeline project options and creates a methodological framework via the construction of an index for evaluation and comparison of the individual projects. The index is constructed on the basis of objectivization of criteria and reflects the long-term vision. It could give us arguments for explaining why new gas pipeline projects for transporting gas to Europe are realised (with Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream being particularly notable) regardless of diversification requirements and elapsed securitization.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Quantifiable Approach to the Selection of Criteria and Indexation for Comparison of the Gas Pipeline Projects Leading to the EU : Diversification Rationality against Securitisation?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The EU is dependent on imports of natural gas, and it has followed the issue of energy security and the need to diversify suppliers. Its political discourse clearly shows a preference for reducing its dependence on Russia, even if it is necessary to incur high costs in order to do so. It turns out, however, that the possibilities for diversification are limited and the reality of the new projects may contradict it. The article identifies the economic and political criteria for the comparison of the gas pipeline project options and creates a methodological framework via the construction of an index for evaluation and comparison of the individual projects. The index is constructed on the basis of objectivization of criteria and reflects the long-term vision. It could give us arguments for explaining why new gas pipeline projects for transporting gas to Europe are realised (with Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream being particularly notable) regardless of diversification requirements and elapsed securitization.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20704 - Energy and fuels

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-00902S" target="_blank" >GA18-00902S: Vnitřní a vnější dimenze aktérství EU v energetických vztazích vůči Rusku a alternativním dodavatelům</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Energy

ISSN

0360-5442

e-ISSN

1873-6785

Svazek periodika

225

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

June 2021, 120238

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1-9

Kód UT WoS článku

000647583700006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85102137987