The Resilience of the Eastern Partnership: The Role of the Visegrad Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000088" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/21:N0000088 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.iir.cz/the-resilience-of-the-eastern-partnership-eap-the-role-of-the-visegrad-countries" target="_blank" >https://www.iir.cz/the-resilience-of-the-eastern-partnership-eap-the-role-of-the-visegrad-countries</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Resilience of the Eastern Partnership: The Role of the Visegrad Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Many of the criticism that the European Union has received regarding its external action in its Eastern neighbourhood are in relation to policy resilience, i.e., are EU’s instruments fit for purpose. The issue of EU’s international actorness was in distress due to developments in its ‘neighbourhood’ such as the crisis in Ukraine or Moldova’s downturn from success story to a captured state, the slow pace of progress and even back-sliding in Armenia or Georgia or the human rights violations in Belarus. To understand the EaP’s potential flexibility and forward-looking quality, this seminar unpacked the Visegrad as a policy learning environment and discussed whether Visegrad countries became EaP policy entrepreneurs to ensure ‘deep and sustainable’ democracy in post-communist countries such as Moldova, Ukraine, or Belarus.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Resilience of the Eastern Partnership: The Role of the Visegrad Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

Many of the criticism that the European Union has received regarding its external action in its Eastern neighbourhood are in relation to policy resilience, i.e., are EU’s instruments fit for purpose. The issue of EU’s international actorness was in distress due to developments in its ‘neighbourhood’ such as the crisis in Ukraine or Moldova’s downturn from success story to a captured state, the slow pace of progress and even back-sliding in Armenia or Georgia or the human rights violations in Belarus. To understand the EaP’s potential flexibility and forward-looking quality, this seminar unpacked the Visegrad as a policy learning environment and discussed whether Visegrad countries became EaP policy entrepreneurs to ensure ‘deep and sustainable’ democracy in post-communist countries such as Moldova, Ukraine, or Belarus.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů