Law and political Islam’s transformations : Egyptian Islamists and the notions of a civil state and a religious party

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000033" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/23:N0000033 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686231172082" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686231172082</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00377686231172082" target="_blank" >10.1177/00377686231172082</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Law and political Islam’s transformations : Egyptian Islamists and the notions of a civil state and a religious party

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Two notions have been at the center of the Egyptian constitutional debates since 2011: the ‘civil state’ and the ‘religious party’. The Muslim Brothers have played on the ambiguity of the notion of a ‘civil state’ as being neither secular nor theocratic, just as their understanding of an Islamic state. The Salafi al-Nūr Party has long refused to embrace the notion. Nevertheless, in 2019 it obtained from the Parliament’s Speaker a definition close to the one defended by the Muslim Brothers and endorsed it as a victory against the secular interpretation of the term. The same ambiguity appears regarding the notion of a ‘religious party’. The al-Nūr Party tried to prevent the interdiction of such parties in the 2014 Constitution. At the same time, it distances itself from the notion, and abides by the law, including Christian members, presenting female candidates, and organically separating political and religious activities.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Law and political Islam’s transformations : Egyptian Islamists and the notions of a civil state and a religious party

Popis výsledku anglicky

Two notions have been at the center of the Egyptian constitutional debates since 2011: the ‘civil state’ and the ‘religious party’. The Muslim Brothers have played on the ambiguity of the notion of a ‘civil state’ as being neither secular nor theocratic, just as their understanding of an Islamic state. The Salafi al-Nūr Party has long refused to embrace the notion. Nevertheless, in 2019 it obtained from the Parliament’s Speaker a definition close to the one defended by the Muslim Brothers and endorsed it as a victory against the secular interpretation of the term. The same ambiguity appears regarding the notion of a ‘religious party’. The al-Nūr Party tried to prevent the interdiction of such parties in the 2014 Constitution. At the same time, it distances itself from the notion, and abides by the law, including Christian members, presenting female candidates, and organically separating political and religious activities.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Social Compass

ISSN

0037-7686

e-ISSN

1461-7404

Svazek periodika

70

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

345-360

Kód UT WoS článku

001001050100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85161623530