Confronting Human Rights Justifications in Climate Litigation: Developing a New Methodological Approach for the Systematic Ongoing Direct Civil Society Engagement

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000011" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/25:N0000011 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/y15v2/1.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/y15v2/1.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.62768/TBJ/2025/15/2/01" target="_blank" >10.62768/TBJ/2025/15/2/01</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Confronting Human Rights Justifications in Climate Litigation: Developing a New Methodological Approach for the Systematic Ongoing Direct Civil Society Engagement

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article introduces and applies the innovative Systematic Ongoing Direct Civil Society Engagement (ODCSE) methodology developed under the Horizon Europe HRJust project (no. 101094346) to examine how states justify their actions through human rights discourse, with a focus on climate litigation. The ODCSE approach emphasizes participatory, iterative engagement with civil society to evaluate the legitimacy and accountability of human rights justifications (HRJs). Drawing on qualitative and quantitative findings, the article shows how the ODCSE methodology has been used to map common state strategies in climate-related HRJs, comparing general and context-specific practices, and identifying the influence ofgeopolitical dynamics. A key contribution of this process is the integration of gender and intersectionality within the ODCSE framework. Recognising that climate impacts-and connected human rights narratives-are shaped by gender, race, and other intersecting factors, the methodology actively includes feminist and marginalised civil society voices in the co-production of knowledge. The article concludes with proposals for strengthening the role of the EU and global actors in promoting transparent, gender-responsive human rights justifications in climate policy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Confronting Human Rights Justifications in Climate Litigation: Developing a New Methodological Approach for the Systematic Ongoing Direct Civil Society Engagement

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article introduces and applies the innovative Systematic Ongoing Direct Civil Society Engagement (ODCSE) methodology developed under the Horizon Europe HRJust project (no. 101094346) to examine how states justify their actions through human rights discourse, with a focus on climate litigation. The ODCSE approach emphasizes participatory, iterative engagement with civil society to evaluate the legitimacy and accountability of human rights justifications (HRJs). Drawing on qualitative and quantitative findings, the article shows how the ODCSE methodology has been used to map common state strategies in climate-related HRJs, comparing general and context-specific practices, and identifying the influence ofgeopolitical dynamics. A key contribution of this process is the integration of gender and intersectionality within the ODCSE framework. Recognising that climate impacts-and connected human rights narratives-are shaped by gender, race, and other intersecting factors, the methodology actively includes feminist and marginalised civil society voices in the co-production of knowledge. The article concludes with proposals for strengthening the role of the EU and global actors in promoting transparent, gender-responsive human rights justifications in climate policy.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law

ISSN

3008-637X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

208 - 229

Kód UT WoS článku

001548465600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105011490956