COMPARISON OF CAPABILITIES OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND SPECIALIZED SOFTWARE PROGRAMS IN EVALUATION OF GEARS
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23210%2F15%3A43926438" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23210/15:43926438 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2015_06_201515" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2015_06_201515</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2015_06_201515" target="_blank" >10.17973/MMSJ.2015_06_201515</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
COMPARISON OF CAPABILITIES OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND SPECIALIZED SOFTWARE PROGRAMS IN EVALUATION OF GEARS
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
When performing the evaluation of engineering structures, today's designers fully depend on software tools available to their employer. The choice of a software program for design calculations and evaluation of structural elements is typically dictated by its price. Where the demand for engineering design services involves simple structures, the designers turn to single-purpose programs based on engineering tables or databases, particularly in small companies. Finite element method (FEM)-based tools forstructural analysis are much less affordable. Also, the time required for FEM analysis is considerably longer than with other methods. As the available design completion times tend to be short, designers typically have to rely on specialized programs (MITCalc, KISSsoft, Autodesk Inventor or PREV). Consequently, they have no other choice but to accept the information and values obtained from these calculation programs, even without understanding their principles
Název v anglickém jazyce
COMPARISON OF CAPABILITIES OF FINITE ELEMENT METHOD AND SPECIALIZED SOFTWARE PROGRAMS IN EVALUATION OF GEARS
Popis výsledku anglicky
When performing the evaluation of engineering structures, today's designers fully depend on software tools available to their employer. The choice of a software program for design calculations and evaluation of structural elements is typically dictated by its price. Where the demand for engineering design services involves simple structures, the designers turn to single-purpose programs based on engineering tables or databases, particularly in small companies. Finite element method (FEM)-based tools forstructural analysis are much less affordable. Also, the time required for FEM analysis is considerably longer than with other methods. As the available design completion times tend to be short, designers typically have to rely on specialized programs (MITCalc, KISSsoft, Autodesk Inventor or PREV). Consequently, they have no other choice but to accept the information and values obtained from these calculation programs, even without understanding their principles
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
JR - Ostatní strojírenství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
MM Science Journal
ISSN
1803-1269
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2015
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
June
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
3
Strana od-do
610-612
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—