Comparison of Methods for Modelling Production Floor Layout
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23210%2F17%3A43951734" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23210/17:43951734 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://scholar.google.cz/scholar?q=Comparison+of+Methods+for+Modelling+Production+Floor+Layout&hl=cs&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart" target="_blank" >https://scholar.google.cz/scholar?q=Comparison+of+Methods+for+Modelling+Production+Floor+Layout&hl=cs&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.117" target="_blank" >10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.117</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of Methods for Modelling Production Floor Layout
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper deals with comparison of two methods for production floor layout design or reengineering – conventional capturing method and 3D laser scanning. Firstly there is an analysis of the current state, where possible uses of scanning technology for production floor design or reengineering are mentioned. Then the processes of both methods are shortly described. The main part of the article is comparison of these two method. For the comparison we have used data acquired during capture of the real factory hall with both methods. The comparison is based on determined criteria – time consumption, user and hardware requirements and quality of outputs. In the conclusion, the suitability of the methods is evaluated. It also shows time consumption differences between methods and difficulty and level of requirements. In the end there are recommendations for scanning method use and for the future work.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of Methods for Modelling Production Floor Layout
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper deals with comparison of two methods for production floor layout design or reengineering – conventional capturing method and 3D laser scanning. Firstly there is an analysis of the current state, where possible uses of scanning technology for production floor design or reengineering are mentioned. Then the processes of both methods are shortly described. The main part of the article is comparison of these two method. For the comparison we have used data acquired during capture of the real factory hall with both methods. The comparison is based on determined criteria – time consumption, user and hardware requirements and quality of outputs. In the conclusion, the suitability of the methods is evaluated. It also shows time consumption differences between methods and difficulty and level of requirements. In the end there are recommendations for scanning method use and for the future work.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 28th DAAAM International Symposium
ISBN
978-3-902734-11-2
ISSN
1726-9679
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
835-844
Název nakladatele
DAAAM International Vienna
Místo vydání
Vienna
Místo konání akce
Zadar
Datum konání akce
8. 11. 2017
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—