Waismann as an unhappy prophet of Wittgenstein

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F14%3A43922451" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/14:43922451 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Waismann as an unhappy prophet of Wittgenstein

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper deals with the cooperation between Wittgenstein and Waismann under Schlick's patronage in the period of 1928-1936. Firstly, the purport and historical development of the project Logik, Sprache, Philosophie which was meant to systematically present the ideas of the Tractatus and later also Wittgenstein's new philosophy is reconstructed. Secondly, the transition from the "principle of verification" to the conceptions of "hypothesis" and "criteria" is expounded. Thirdly, the controversy that arose due to Waismann's "insufficient" acknowledgement of Wittgenstein in a paper on identity is recalled. These three expositions are intended as arguments for the reconsideration of, first, Waismann's alleged plagiarism or misinterpretation of Wittgenstein, and, second, Wittgenstein's purported reluctance to set up a scholarly-like theory of semantics.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Waismann as an unhappy prophet of Wittgenstein

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper deals with the cooperation between Wittgenstein and Waismann under Schlick's patronage in the period of 1928-1936. Firstly, the purport and historical development of the project Logik, Sprache, Philosophie which was meant to systematically present the ideas of the Tractatus and later also Wittgenstein's new philosophy is reconstructed. Secondly, the transition from the "principle of verification" to the conceptions of "hypothesis" and "criteria" is expounded. Thirdly, the controversy that arose due to Waismann's "insufficient" acknowledgement of Wittgenstein in a paper on identity is recalled. These three expositions are intended as arguments for the reconsideration of, first, Waismann's alleged plagiarism or misinterpretation of Wittgenstein, and, second, Wittgenstein's purported reluctance to set up a scholarly-like theory of semantics.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GPP401%2F11%2FP097" target="_blank" >GPP401/11/P097: Friedrich Waismann a jeho dílo</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů