Right for the Wrong Reasons: Reflections on Modern Human Origins in the Post-Neanderthal Genome Era
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F14%3A43923767" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/14:43923767 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/679068" target="_blank" >http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/679068</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679068" target="_blank" >10.1086/679068</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Right for the Wrong Reasons: Reflections on Modern Human Origins in the Post-Neanderthal Genome Era
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The sequencing of the Neanderthal genome answered once and for all the question of whether these hominins played a role in the origins of modern humans-they did, and a majority of humans alive today retain a small portion of Neanderthal genes. This finding rejects the strictest versions of the Recent African Origin model and has been celebrated by supporters of Multiregional Evolution (MRE). However, we argue that MRE can also be rejected and that other, intermediate, models of modern human origins better represent the means by which modern humans became the only extant human species. We argue this because we reject one of the major tenets of MRE: global gene flow that prevents cladogenesis from occurring. First, using reconstructions of Pleistocene hominin census size, we maintain that populations were neither large nor dense enough to result in such high levels of gene flow across the Old World. Second, we use mammalian divergence and hybridization data to show that the emergence of
Název v anglickém jazyce
Right for the Wrong Reasons: Reflections on Modern Human Origins in the Post-Neanderthal Genome Era
Popis výsledku anglicky
The sequencing of the Neanderthal genome answered once and for all the question of whether these hominins played a role in the origins of modern humans-they did, and a majority of humans alive today retain a small portion of Neanderthal genes. This finding rejects the strictest versions of the Recent African Origin model and has been celebrated by supporters of Multiregional Evolution (MRE). However, we argue that MRE can also be rejected and that other, intermediate, models of modern human origins better represent the means by which modern humans became the only extant human species. We argue this because we reject one of the major tenets of MRE: global gene flow that prevents cladogenesis from occurring. First, using reconstructions of Pleistocene hominin census size, we maintain that populations were neither large nor dense enough to result in such high levels of gene flow across the Old World. Second, we use mammalian divergence and hybridization data to show that the emergence of
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0135" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0135: Nové technologie ve vědách o (současných i minulých) společnostech</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY
ISSN
0011-3204
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
55
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
29
Strana od-do
696-724
Kód UT WoS článku
000346050400003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—