This is not political science!
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F15%3A43928449" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/15:43928449 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
This is not political science!
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This presentation, based on research experience in the project "Critical political sociology of (in)security professionals", funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, dealt with the problems produced by associating with unorthodox theoretical approaches and methodologies in the field of Czech political science, security studies and international relations, specific practices of stigmatization and marginalization of theoretical perspectives, concepts, authors and research techniques deemed to bealien to the fields by certain disciplinary authorities, though more than well-established in the respective disciplinary fields abroad. Exploring the existing arguments against particular theoretical frameworks, techniques and authors and weighing the role they play in academic politics, the presentation attempted to point at the inert character of the dominant (mainstream) disciplinary discourse, related inability to participate in key debates taking place abroad, its very limited abil
Název v anglickém jazyce
This is not political science!
Popis výsledku anglicky
This presentation, based on research experience in the project "Critical political sociology of (in)security professionals", funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, dealt with the problems produced by associating with unorthodox theoretical approaches and methodologies in the field of Czech political science, security studies and international relations, specific practices of stigmatization and marginalization of theoretical perspectives, concepts, authors and research techniques deemed to bealien to the fields by certain disciplinary authorities, though more than well-established in the respective disciplinary fields abroad. Exploring the existing arguments against particular theoretical frameworks, techniques and authors and weighing the role they play in academic politics, the presentation attempted to point at the inert character of the dominant (mainstream) disciplinary discourse, related inability to participate in key debates taking place abroad, its very limited abil
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GP14-10641P" target="_blank" >GP14-10641P: Kritická politická sociologie (ne)bezpečnosti: dramaturgická analýza veřejných událostí v poli (ne)bezpečnostních expertů</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů