Workshop on Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F19%3A43954946" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/19:43954946 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Workshop on Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Workshop focused on the concept of a neural correlate of consciousness (NCC) which is at the heart of the booming neuroscience of consciousness. The classical elucidation of this concept was due to Chalmers (2000), who understood it as that neural activation minimally sufficient for a conscious experience. Active participants were talking about Chalmers’ idea of NCC which proably does not capture what an NCC should be. Prof. Sascha Benjamin Fink was talking about how to operationalise NCC concept and how we should understand this concept of an NCC based on some historic, pragmatic and meta-theoretical constraints (i.e. metaphysical promiscuity, intertheoretic competition, exclusionary evidence, activation bias) and defend this NCC2.0 (which focuses specifically on a symmetrical correlation between types) against recent critique by Polák &amp; Marvan (2018). Dr. Michal Polák and dr. Tomáš Marvan then, in their papers, commented on FInk´s approach and especially on his novel definition of NCC.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Workshop on Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Popis výsledku anglicky

Workshop focused on the concept of a neural correlate of consciousness (NCC) which is at the heart of the booming neuroscience of consciousness. The classical elucidation of this concept was due to Chalmers (2000), who understood it as that neural activation minimally sufficient for a conscious experience. Active participants were talking about Chalmers’ idea of NCC which proably does not capture what an NCC should be. Prof. Sascha Benjamin Fink was talking about how to operationalise NCC concept and how we should understand this concept of an NCC based on some historic, pragmatic and meta-theoretical constraints (i.e. metaphysical promiscuity, intertheoretic competition, exclusionary evidence, activation bias) and defend this NCC2.0 (which focuses specifically on a symmetrical correlation between types) against recent critique by Polák &amp; Marvan (2018). Dr. Michal Polák and dr. Tomáš Marvan then, in their papers, commented on FInk´s approach and especially on his novel definition of NCC.

Druh

W - Uspořádání workshopu

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

ZČU v Plzni, FF, Katedra filozofie

Stát konání akce

CZ - Česká republika

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

14

Počet zahraničních účastníků

2

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

EUR - Evropská akce