Walter Charleton’s Theory of Matter: How Politics and Scientific Societies Influenced his Works
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F20%3A43958657" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/20:43958657 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.athensjournals.gr/ajhis" target="_blank" >https://www.athensjournals.gr/ajhis</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajhis.6-3-4" target="_blank" >10.30958/ajhis.6-3-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Walter Charleton’s Theory of Matter: How Politics and Scientific Societies Influenced his Works
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper investigates how the politics and the scientific societies influenced Walter Charleton’s matter theory. Initially, the study refers to two different historical theories of analysis of Charleton’s theory of matter, explaining, through the analysis of his most well-known works, why these historical perspectives are both correct. Next, the study undertakes a close reading of Charleton’s life, with the aim of explaining why he divorced himself from the alchemical doctrines in public, while he continued to use the alchemical terms. Investigating his life, the study shows how he was influenced by the politics, religion and scientific communities of his era. As Charleton, a Royalist, lived in the period of the Interregnum and Restoration and his major goals were to acquire a position and funds from the College of Physicians and Royal Society. Finally, the study provides a different historical view about Charleton’s eclecticism, which is used to his theory, in order to be part of the “elite” of scholars in England. This study concludes that Charleton’s matter theory can be considered hybrid of vitalistic and mechanistic philosophy and is an example of how the scientific theories, in the late seventeenthcentury, began to differentiate from the old ones.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Walter Charleton’s Theory of Matter: How Politics and Scientific Societies Influenced his Works
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper investigates how the politics and the scientific societies influenced Walter Charleton’s matter theory. Initially, the study refers to two different historical theories of analysis of Charleton’s theory of matter, explaining, through the analysis of his most well-known works, why these historical perspectives are both correct. Next, the study undertakes a close reading of Charleton’s life, with the aim of explaining why he divorced himself from the alchemical doctrines in public, while he continued to use the alchemical terms. Investigating his life, the study shows how he was influenced by the politics, religion and scientific communities of his era. As Charleton, a Royalist, lived in the period of the Interregnum and Restoration and his major goals were to acquire a position and funds from the College of Physicians and Royal Society. Finally, the study provides a different historical view about Charleton’s eclecticism, which is used to his theory, in order to be part of the “elite” of scholars in England. This study concludes that Charleton’s matter theory can be considered hybrid of vitalistic and mechanistic philosophy and is an example of how the scientific theories, in the late seventeenthcentury, began to differentiate from the old ones.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Athens Journal of History
ISSN
2407-9677
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
6
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GR - Řecká republika
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
287-297
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—