Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23510%2F14%3A43922160" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23510/14:43922160 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7056" target="_blank" >https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7056</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-002" target="_blank" >10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article provides an extensive analysis of the development of regional competitiveness in the Czech Republic over time. At first the attention is paid to the meaning of "regional competitiveness" and to the evaluation of proposed methods to quantify it. After that the quantification of regional competitiveness is made according to the chosen method, which is based on a large number of indicators and then these indicators are summarized into three areas: Macroeconomic Performance, Growth Potential andQuality of Life. More than 4,200 figures represent eighteen indicators of fourteen regions during the time period of seventeen years and describe the level of regions from the viewpoint of various aspects. The ranking of individual regions in the threeareas mentioned above is compiled on the basis of the selected measurement method of competitiveness. The level and dynamics of regions were in conformity with the expected results: Prague is the best region, followed by Jihomoravský and

Název v anglickém jazyce

Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article provides an extensive analysis of the development of regional competitiveness in the Czech Republic over time. At first the attention is paid to the meaning of "regional competitiveness" and to the evaluation of proposed methods to quantify it. After that the quantification of regional competitiveness is made according to the chosen method, which is based on a large number of indicators and then these indicators are summarized into three areas: Macroeconomic Performance, Growth Potential andQuality of Life. More than 4,200 figures represent eighteen indicators of fourteen regions during the time period of seventeen years and describe the level of regions from the viewpoint of various aspects. The ranking of individual regions in the threeareas mentioned above is compiled on the basis of the selected measurement method of competitiveness. The level and dynamics of regions were in conformity with the expected results: Prague is the best region, followed by Jihomoravský and

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

E+M. Ekonomie a Management

ISSN

1212-3609

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

14-33

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—