Critical Success Factors for Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions in Central Europe: Empirical Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23510%2F23%3A43968639" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23510/23:43968639 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstream/handle/15240/172154/EM_2_2023_02.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y" target="_blank" >https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstream/handle/15240/172154/EM_2_2023_02.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2023-2-002" target="_blank" >10.15240/tul/001/2023-2-002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Critical Success Factors for Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions in Central Europe: Empirical Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article aims to evaluate critical success factors in the use of the Public Procurement for Innovations (PPI) concept. The first part of the article deals with a systematic research literature review on the topic of critical success factors for PPI. In the second part, the authors present empirical research conducted as an add-on to the projects PPI2Innovate and RI2integrate within the Europe and Interreg Danube programs. These projects (whose research team included one of the authors of this paper) analyzed the use of the PPI concept in the EU. The authors approached the teams of experts formed in six countries for the purpose of these two projects to make a list of critical success factors, engaging the Delphi method, for the implementation of projects using the PPI method. Sixteen most frequently recurring critical success factors were chosen for further evaluation. These critical factors were then evaluated on a Likert scale in terms of their significance. This is followed by a discussion of the results of the critical factors identified within the systematic literature review with regards to other authors and existing research. In the final part of the article, possible solutions based on experience from pilot projects are proposed to strengthen the usability of the PPI concept. When comparing the key success factors resulting from the literature review with those identified within the expert research, it is apparent that they are mostly the same, although there are slight differences. The expert research identified the sharing of best practices and model projects in the country as additional key success factors.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Critical Success Factors for Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions in Central Europe: Empirical Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article aims to evaluate critical success factors in the use of the Public Procurement for Innovations (PPI) concept. The first part of the article deals with a systematic research literature review on the topic of critical success factors for PPI. In the second part, the authors present empirical research conducted as an add-on to the projects PPI2Innovate and RI2integrate within the Europe and Interreg Danube programs. These projects (whose research team included one of the authors of this paper) analyzed the use of the PPI concept in the EU. The authors approached the teams of experts formed in six countries for the purpose of these two projects to make a list of critical success factors, engaging the Delphi method, for the implementation of projects using the PPI method. Sixteen most frequently recurring critical success factors were chosen for further evaluation. These critical factors were then evaluated on a Likert scale in terms of their significance. This is followed by a discussion of the results of the critical factors identified within the systematic literature review with regards to other authors and existing research. In the final part of the article, possible solutions based on experience from pilot projects are proposed to strengthen the usability of the PPI concept. When comparing the key success factors resulting from the literature review with those identified within the expert research, it is apparent that they are mostly the same, although there are slight differences. The expert research identified the sharing of best practices and model projects in the country as additional key success factors.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50204 - Business and management

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

E + M. Ekonomie a Management

ISSN

1212-3609

e-ISSN

2336-5064

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

24-41

Kód UT WoS článku

001011410800002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85161878799