AIVA vs UML: Comparison of Component Application Visualizations in a Case-Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F12%3A43916144" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23520/12:43916144 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.20" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.20</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.20" target="_blank" >10.1109/IV.2012.20</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

AIVA vs UML: Comparison of Component Application Visualizations in a Case-Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

UML is the state of the art in visualization of software. However, it does not satisfy the needs of modeling in the domain of component applications and complex software architectures. UML has to be extended with profiles so as to be able to model the specifics of a particular component model; its diagrams are not scalable, therefore one has to balance the amount of information and readability; and finally, UML presents all the information at once so visual data mining is harder. These were the reasonsfor developing a completely new approach called AIVA (Advanced Interactive Visualization Approach) that focuses solely on the component domain and addresses the problems of scalability and readability by adopting interactive techniques like information hiding and details on demand. In this paper we analyse how this new approach stands compared with UML by modelling a nontrivial component application.

Název v anglickém jazyce

AIVA vs UML: Comparison of Component Application Visualizations in a Case-Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

UML is the state of the art in visualization of software. However, it does not satisfy the needs of modeling in the domain of component applications and complex software architectures. UML has to be extended with profiles so as to be able to model the specifics of a particular component model; its diagrams are not scalable, therefore one has to balance the amount of information and readability; and finally, UML presents all the information at once so visual data mining is harder. These were the reasonsfor developing a completely new approach called AIVA (Advanced Interactive Visualization Approach) that focuses solely on the component domain and addresses the problems of scalability and readability by adopting interactive techniques like information hiding and details on demand. In this paper we analyse how this new approach stands compared with UML by modelling a nontrivial component application.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Information Visualization

ISBN

978-0-7695-4771-8

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

54-61

Název nakladatele

IEEE - CPS

Místo vydání

Los Alamitos

Místo konání akce

Montpellier, Francie

Datum konání akce

11. 7. 2012

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—