Ethics Committee or Community? Examining the Identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the Period of Transition
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F10%3A00012210" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/10:00012210 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Ethics Committee or Community? Examining the Identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the Period of Transition
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Reflecting on a three year long exploratory research of ethics committees in the Czech Republic authors discuss the current role and identity of research ethics committees. The research of Czech ethics committees focused on both self-presentation and self-understanding of ECs members, and how other stakeholders (representatives of the pharmaceutical industry) view them. The exploratory research was based on formal and informal communication with the members of the ethics committees. Members of the research team took part at six regular voluntary meetings of the ethics committees? members, organized by the Forum of Czech Ethics Committees, and at three summer schools of medical ethics. There were realized twenty-five semi-structured interviews as well as six focus group sessions and a participant observation of several regular meetings of three ethics committees. On the grounds of experience from the interviews a simple questionnaire survey was realized among the members of the ethics c
Název v anglickém jazyce
Ethics Committee or Community? Examining the Identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the Period of Transition
Popis výsledku anglicky
Reflecting on a three year long exploratory research of ethics committees in the Czech Republic authors discuss the current role and identity of research ethics committees. The research of Czech ethics committees focused on both self-presentation and self-understanding of ECs members, and how other stakeholders (representatives of the pharmaceutical industry) view them. The exploratory research was based on formal and informal communication with the members of the ethics committees. Members of the research team took part at six regular voluntary meetings of the ethics committees? members, organized by the Forum of Czech Ethics Committees, and at three summer schools of medical ethics. There were realized twenty-five semi-structured interviews as well as six focus group sessions and a participant observation of several regular meetings of three ethics committees. On the grounds of experience from the interviews a simple questionnaire survey was realized among the members of the ethics c
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA406%2F07%2F0257" target="_blank" >GA406/07/0257: Etické aspekty regulace klinického výzkumu a role etických komisí v České republice</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2010
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Medical Ethics
ISSN
0306-6800
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
36
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000283470800008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—