Secondary prevention of colorectal cancer
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F19%3A43899833" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/19:43899833 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://casopis-zsfju.zsf.jcu.cz/journal-of-nursing-social-studies-public-health-and-rehabilitation/administrace/clankyfile/20200124145710305537.pdf" target="_blank" >http://casopis-zsfju.zsf.jcu.cz/journal-of-nursing-social-studies-public-health-and-rehabilitation/administrace/clankyfile/20200124145710305537.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Secondary prevention of colorectal cancer
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Goal: The goal of this review study is to map the options of secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.Methods: We used the method of document content analysis. We searched for references using the following keywords: “screening”, “colorectal cancer”, “occult bleeding”, “colonoscopy”, and the Boole operators “AND” and “NOT”. We used the databases of EBSCO, ProQuest and Pubmed between February and April 2019. After the filtering, we included 20 sources. Results: The study shows that if colorectal cancer is treated in the early phase, there is a higher probability of survival. We also confirmed a decreased incidence and mortality using the screening of risk groups. The colorectal carcinoma screening is carried out by testing the stool or colonoscopy. To test the stool, we can use haemoccult (gFOBT), immunochemical techniques (FIT) or DNA mutation testing in the stool. Conclusion: There is not a unanimous recommendation for colorectal carcinoma screening. Some countries have state regulations. This research shows that there is not sufficient proof for using haemoccult tests or immunochemical techniques.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Secondary prevention of colorectal cancer
Popis výsledku anglicky
Goal: The goal of this review study is to map the options of secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.Methods: We used the method of document content analysis. We searched for references using the following keywords: “screening”, “colorectal cancer”, “occult bleeding”, “colonoscopy”, and the Boole operators “AND” and “NOT”. We used the databases of EBSCO, ProQuest and Pubmed between February and April 2019. After the filtering, we included 20 sources. Results: The study shows that if colorectal cancer is treated in the early phase, there is a higher probability of survival. We also confirmed a decreased incidence and mortality using the screening of risk groups. The colorectal carcinoma screening is carried out by testing the stool or colonoscopy. To test the stool, we can use haemoccult (gFOBT), immunochemical techniques (FIT) or DNA mutation testing in the stool. Conclusion: There is not a unanimous recommendation for colorectal carcinoma screening. Some countries have state regulations. This research shows that there is not sufficient proof for using haemoccult tests or immunochemical techniques.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30307 - Nursing
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Nursing, Social Studies, Public Health and Rehabilitation
ISSN
1804-1868
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3-4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
104-110
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—