Adverse events in anaesthesia care

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F20%3A43901388" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/20:43901388 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/49777513:23310/20:43959243

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://kont.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/knt/2020/03/09.pdf" target="_blank" >https://kont.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/knt/2020/03/09.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32725/kont.2020.011" target="_blank" >10.32725/kont.2020.011</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Adverse events in anaesthesia care

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The goal of this review study was to summarize research conclusions on reported adverse events in anaesthesia care regarding paediatric and adult patients in the last 10 years. Methods: Relevant sources were found in scientific databases EBSCO, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley and Scopus. We used the following keywords: adverse events/incident/malpractice, anaesthesia, report. Other criteria for the inclusion of studies were: full-text, English language, publications that were no older than 10 years (2009–2019) and human related. In the end, we included 15 studies. Results: The studies (analytical, prospective, retrospective, cohort, observational, systematic revisions and meta-analyses) mostly specify the areas and frequencies of reported adverse events and deal with the efficiency of report procedures and their implementation in clinical practice. The most frequent adverse events that occurred in anaesthesia care were respiration and cardiovascular problems and medical errors. The level of their occurrence varied by the patients’ age. Conclusions: The monitoring and assessment of adverse events is an effective instrument for the improvement of quality and safety in anaesthesia practical care. The main problem is the unwillingness of medical workers to participate in reporting adverse events and the incompatibility of adverse event databases in anaesthesia care.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Adverse events in anaesthesia care

Popis výsledku anglicky

The goal of this review study was to summarize research conclusions on reported adverse events in anaesthesia care regarding paediatric and adult patients in the last 10 years. Methods: Relevant sources were found in scientific databases EBSCO, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley and Scopus. We used the following keywords: adverse events/incident/malpractice, anaesthesia, report. Other criteria for the inclusion of studies were: full-text, English language, publications that were no older than 10 years (2009–2019) and human related. In the end, we included 15 studies. Results: The studies (analytical, prospective, retrospective, cohort, observational, systematic revisions and meta-analyses) mostly specify the areas and frequencies of reported adverse events and deal with the efficiency of report procedures and their implementation in clinical practice. The most frequent adverse events that occurred in anaesthesia care were respiration and cardiovascular problems and medical errors. The level of their occurrence varied by the patients’ age. Conclusions: The monitoring and assessment of adverse events is an effective instrument for the improvement of quality and safety in anaesthesia practical care. The main problem is the unwillingness of medical workers to participate in reporting adverse events and the incompatibility of adverse event databases in anaesthesia care.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Kontakt (vědecký časopis ZSF JU)

ISSN

1212-4117

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

183-192

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85093897367