Barriers and facilitators in using a Clinical Decision Support System for fall risk management for older people: a European survey

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F22%3A43903528" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/22:43903528 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/22:10437381

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8734223/file/8734224.pdf" target="_blank" >https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8734223/file/8734224.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00599-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s41999-021-00599-w</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Barriers and facilitators in using a Clinical Decision Support System for fall risk management for older people: a European survey

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Abstract Purpose Fall-Risk Increasing Drugs (FRIDs) are an important and modifiable fall-risk factor. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) could support doctors in optimal FRIDs deprescribing. Understanding barriers and facilitators is important for a successful implementation of any CDSS. We conducted a European survey to assess barriers and facilitators to CDSS use and explored differences in their perceptions. Methods We examined and compared the relative importance and the occurrence of regional differences of a literature-based list of barriers and facilitators for CDSS usage among physicians treating older fallers from 11 European countries. Results We surveyed 581 physicians (mean age 44.9 years, 64.5% female, 71.3% geriatricians). The main barriers were technical issues (66%) and indicating a reason before overriding an alert (58%). The main facilitators were a CDSS that is beneficial for patient care (68%) and easy-to-use (64%). We identified regional differences, e.g., expense and legal issues were barriers for significantly more Eastern-European physicians compared to other regions, while training was selected less often as a facilitator by West-European physicians. Some physicians believed that due to the medical complexity of their patients, their own clinical judgement is better than advice from the CDSS. Conclusion When designing a CDSS for Geriatric Medicine, the patient&apos;s medical complexity must be addressed whilst maintaining the doctor&apos;s decision-making autonomy. For a successful CDSS implementation in Europe, regional differences in barrier perception should be overcome. Equipping a CDSS with prediction models has the potential to provide individualized recommendations for deprescribing FRIDs in older falls patients.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Barriers and facilitators in using a Clinical Decision Support System for fall risk management for older people: a European survey

Popis výsledku anglicky

Abstract Purpose Fall-Risk Increasing Drugs (FRIDs) are an important and modifiable fall-risk factor. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) could support doctors in optimal FRIDs deprescribing. Understanding barriers and facilitators is important for a successful implementation of any CDSS. We conducted a European survey to assess barriers and facilitators to CDSS use and explored differences in their perceptions. Methods We examined and compared the relative importance and the occurrence of regional differences of a literature-based list of barriers and facilitators for CDSS usage among physicians treating older fallers from 11 European countries. Results We surveyed 581 physicians (mean age 44.9 years, 64.5% female, 71.3% geriatricians). The main barriers were technical issues (66%) and indicating a reason before overriding an alert (58%). The main facilitators were a CDSS that is beneficial for patient care (68%) and easy-to-use (64%). We identified regional differences, e.g., expense and legal issues were barriers for significantly more Eastern-European physicians compared to other regions, while training was selected less often as a facilitator by West-European physicians. Some physicians believed that due to the medical complexity of their patients, their own clinical judgement is better than advice from the CDSS. Conclusion When designing a CDSS for Geriatric Medicine, the patient&apos;s medical complexity must be addressed whilst maintaining the doctor&apos;s decision-making autonomy. For a successful CDSS implementation in Europe, regional differences in barrier perception should be overcome. Equipping a CDSS with prediction models has the potential to provide individualized recommendations for deprescribing FRIDs in older falls patients.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30227 - Geriatrics and gerontology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Geriatric Medicine

ISSN

1878-7649

e-ISSN

1878-7657

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

395-405

Kód UT WoS článku

000742786600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85123235750