Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Depression and anxiety in women during physiological pregnancy

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F24%3A43910280" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/24:43910280 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.nel.edu/userfiles/articlesnew/1742636518_45_78_veleminsky_523-pdf.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.nel.edu/userfiles/articlesnew/1742636518_45_78_veleminsky_523-pdf.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Depression and anxiety in women during physiological pregnancy

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The quality of prenatal care for women during pregnancy, in terms of monitoring somatic development, is generally high. The study aims to evaluate the psychosocial situation (well being) of pregnant women during a physiological pregnancy. The care of psychosocial issues of pregnant women is not systematic and often does not occur at all. Prenatal depression and anxiety are associated with an increased risk of depression even after delivery. To accomplish the goal, the authors chose both the modified Freybergh scale- the Sabbatsberg anxiety- frustration Self-Rating Scale (SDS) and a questionnaire created by the authors of this study. A total of 324 women from various regions were randomly approached, of which 277 were selected for the final evaluation. The scale contains seven categories, each with ten questions. Pregnant women repeatedly took the self- assessment over the duration of their pregnancy. The result is a summary point evaluation. The seven individual groups of questions focused on the evaluation of stress, fear, depression, regression, feelings of guilt, frustration, and aggression. The scale of answers to individual questions offered five options. The questionnaire itself had 14 monitored items and evaluated the difference in symptoms in women with and without psychological distress. The degree of psychological distress was processed using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, it was classified into four equal groups (175 points each), identified as none, mild, moderate and high deprivation. The adjusted effect of the monitored parameters on the psychological distress score was studied using a mixed model. The results of the study draw attention to psychological distress in pregnant women with physiological pregnancies. It is vital to monitor symptoms of psychological distress during physiological pregnancies. In addition, preventive prenatal programs to reduce or prevent psychological distress during pregnancies must be implemented and widely available.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Depression and anxiety in women during physiological pregnancy

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The quality of prenatal care for women during pregnancy, in terms of monitoring somatic development, is generally high. The study aims to evaluate the psychosocial situation (well being) of pregnant women during a physiological pregnancy. The care of psychosocial issues of pregnant women is not systematic and often does not occur at all. Prenatal depression and anxiety are associated with an increased risk of depression even after delivery. To accomplish the goal, the authors chose both the modified Freybergh scale- the Sabbatsberg anxiety- frustration Self-Rating Scale (SDS) and a questionnaire created by the authors of this study. A total of 324 women from various regions were randomly approached, of which 277 were selected for the final evaluation. The scale contains seven categories, each with ten questions. Pregnant women repeatedly took the self- assessment over the duration of their pregnancy. The result is a summary point evaluation. The seven individual groups of questions focused on the evaluation of stress, fear, depression, regression, feelings of guilt, frustration, and aggression. The scale of answers to individual questions offered five options. The questionnaire itself had 14 monitored items and evaluated the difference in symptoms in women with and without psychological distress. The degree of psychological distress was processed using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, it was classified into four equal groups (175 points each), identified as none, mild, moderate and high deprivation. The adjusted effect of the monitored parameters on the psychological distress score was studied using a mixed model. The results of the study draw attention to psychological distress in pregnant women with physiological pregnancies. It is vital to monitor symptoms of psychological distress during physiological pregnancies. In addition, preventive prenatal programs to reduce or prevent psychological distress during pregnancies must be implemented and widely available.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30307 - Nursing

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Neuroendocrinology Letters

  • ISSN

    0172-780X

  • e-ISSN

    2354-4716

  • Svazek periodika

    45

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    7-8

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SE - Švédské království

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

    523-538

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001461713200011

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105004746580