Ivan the Terrible in the Russian Historiography of the 19th–21st Centuries. Problems, Methodology, Opinions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12210%2F18%3A43898565" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12210/18:43898565 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ivan the Terrible in the Russian Historiography of the 19th–21st Centuries. Problems, Methodology, Opinions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The rise of academic interest in the Russo-European relationships shed light on one of the most intense periods of Russian history, the reign of Ivan the Terrible (Ivan Grozny). Although the ruler himself is known worldwide, his Russian historiography of 19 th – 21 st centuries is nether widely studied nor systematized. To set it in order, this contribution suggests a two-pronged approach. Firstly, in overviews the Grozny’s historiography as an interdisciplinary field called the Grozny studies (Russian „groznovyedenie“), dealing with the tsar’s personality and rule. They take the form of three lines of study, „apologetic“, „criticizing“ and „objectivist“, conflicting but nevertheless complementary. Secondly, it maps out four categories of problems on which historians focus. They are Ivan’s personality (heavily tilted to his psychopathological traits in 19 th century), his home policies and campaigns against the Tartars, the terror of oprichnina and lastly, the foreign policy, where the Livonian war clearly dominates.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ivan the Terrible in the Russian Historiography of the 19th–21st Centuries. Problems, Methodology, Opinions

Popis výsledku anglicky

The rise of academic interest in the Russo-European relationships shed light on one of the most intense periods of Russian history, the reign of Ivan the Terrible (Ivan Grozny). Although the ruler himself is known worldwide, his Russian historiography of 19 th – 21 st centuries is nether widely studied nor systematized. To set it in order, this contribution suggests a two-pronged approach. Firstly, in overviews the Grozny’s historiography as an interdisciplinary field called the Grozny studies (Russian „groznovyedenie“), dealing with the tsar’s personality and rule. They take the form of three lines of study, „apologetic“, „criticizing“ and „objectivist“, conflicting but nevertheless complementary. Secondly, it maps out four categories of problems on which historians focus. They are Ivan’s personality (heavily tilted to his psychopathological traits in 19 th century), his home policies and campaigns against the Tartars, the terror of oprichnina and lastly, the foreign policy, where the Livonian war clearly dominates.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Opera historica. Časopis pro dějiny raného novověku

ISSN

1805-790X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

83-105

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—