Legal Aspects of the Position of Slovakia in the Newly Established Czechoslovakia in Vratislav Kalousek´s Interpretation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12210%2F20%3A43901485" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12210/20:43901485 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa/2020/Tom-13-Zeszyt-3-2020/" target="_blank" >https://www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa/2020/Tom-13-Zeszyt-3-2020/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.20.023.12518" target="_blank" >10.4467/20844131KS.20.023.12518</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Legal Aspects of the Position of Slovakia in the Newly Established Czechoslovakia in Vratislav Kalousek´s Interpretation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The following text examines the topic of unifying territories with disparate legal traditions as exemplified by Czechoslovakia during the first years of its existence and interpreted by Vratislav Kalousek (1883–1936), an unjustly forgotten clerk at the Ministry of the Interior, a lawyer and a contributor to inter-war legal magazines. He analyzed how the Czechoslovak law – drafted by the Czechoslovak officials of the Cisleithanian tradition – was implemented in the newly acquired lands, namely in Slovakia and in Carpathian Ruthenia. Vratislav Kalousek perceived the foundation of Czechoslovakia, based on uniting lands with a different history, as well as cultural, social and legal traditions, as a situation in which it was necessary to act swiftly, instead of slowing the process down with emphasis on accuracy typical for legal theory.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Legal Aspects of the Position of Slovakia in the Newly Established Czechoslovakia in Vratislav Kalousek´s Interpretation
Popis výsledku anglicky
The following text examines the topic of unifying territories with disparate legal traditions as exemplified by Czechoslovakia during the first years of its existence and interpreted by Vratislav Kalousek (1883–1936), an unjustly forgotten clerk at the Ministry of the Interior, a lawyer and a contributor to inter-war legal magazines. He analyzed how the Czechoslovak law – drafted by the Czechoslovak officials of the Cisleithanian tradition – was implemented in the newly acquired lands, namely in Slovakia and in Carpathian Ruthenia. Vratislav Kalousek perceived the foundation of Czechoslovakia, based on uniting lands with a different history, as well as cultural, social and legal traditions, as a situation in which it was necessary to act swiftly, instead of slowing the process down with emphasis on accuracy typical for legal theory.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa
ISSN
2084-4115
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
321-328
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—