“Teleology, Economy and the Voice of the Voiceless: Science, Literature and Proto-Ecocriticism at the Threshold of the Romantic Period”

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12210%2F23%3A43907554" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12210/23:43907554 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://revistaacademicaliletrad.wordpress.com/volumen-6/" target="_blank" >https://revistaacademicaliletrad.wordpress.com/volumen-6/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

“Teleology, Economy and the Voice of the Voiceless: Science, Literature and Proto-Ecocriticism at the Threshold of the Romantic Period”

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The following article discusses the concept of economy of nature in the writings of Gilbert White (1720-1793) and Carl Linneaus (1707-1778) and the impact their work had on the rise of the Romantic ecological sensitivity and the beginnings of ecology. It themetises the oscillation of the proto-ecological thought between the concepts of usefulness and enchantment: nature is thought to have a specific form of pro-existence: it provides sustenance, but it also represents the most fundamental source of beauty humanity possesses. The discussion of the work of Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) offers an insight into one of the key Romantic attempts to integrate usefulness and enchantment into a concept of a synthetic co-existence. The late 19th century split between the Geisteswissenschaften and Naturwissenschaften shows how this Romantic vision deteriorates into a sense of detached objectivity. The rise of the modern eco-consciousness (and eco-criticism) in the 20th century proves the vitality of the duality between emotional identification (enchantment) and rational analysis (usefulness): i.e., preserving the awareness that we depend on the planet and the incredible potential we have to articulate the voice of the voiceless in science and in poetry.

Název v anglickém jazyce

“Teleology, Economy and the Voice of the Voiceless: Science, Literature and Proto-Ecocriticism at the Threshold of the Romantic Period”

Popis výsledku anglicky

The following article discusses the concept of economy of nature in the writings of Gilbert White (1720-1793) and Carl Linneaus (1707-1778) and the impact their work had on the rise of the Romantic ecological sensitivity and the beginnings of ecology. It themetises the oscillation of the proto-ecological thought between the concepts of usefulness and enchantment: nature is thought to have a specific form of pro-existence: it provides sustenance, but it also represents the most fundamental source of beauty humanity possesses. The discussion of the work of Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) offers an insight into one of the key Romantic attempts to integrate usefulness and enchantment into a concept of a synthetic co-existence. The late 19th century split between the Geisteswissenschaften and Naturwissenschaften shows how this Romantic vision deteriorates into a sense of detached objectivity. The rise of the modern eco-consciousness (and eco-criticism) in the 20th century proves the vitality of the duality between emotional identification (enchantment) and rational analysis (usefulness): i.e., preserving the awareness that we depend on the planet and the incredible potential we have to articulate the voice of the voiceless in science and in poetry.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60205 - Literary theory

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Revista académica liTETRAd

ISSN

2444-7439

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

leden

Stát vydavatele periodika

ES - Španělské království

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

16-26

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—