Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F18%3A43897991" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/18:43897991 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60076658:12510/18:43897991 RIV/00216224:14560/18:00103437 RIV/47813059:19520/18:00011072

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Residents&apos; preferences are one of the factors in deciding how brownfields should be revitalized. We compare the views of residents in a city with many brownfields (Karvina) with those in a city with only few brownfields (Ceske Budejovice). We assessed the preferences of residents for four global regeneration alternatives (refurbishment, demolition, open space, (re)development) in three different areas of a city (city centre, inner city, city outskirts). A one percent population sample of two post-socialistic cities in the Czech Republic, was used for the comparison. Positive preferences towards brownfield regeneration were confirmed. We found spatial differences in preferences between refurbishment and demolition of brownfields in each city area: demolition was preferred for inner city brownfields whereas refurbishment was preferred in the city centre and outskirts. Differences were also identified between the two cities: residents of the brownfield rich city preferred demolition, whereas residents of the city with few brownfields preferred refurbishment. Creating new public open space, for residents&apos; recreation, was given a lower importance within the city centre and a higher significance in outskirts. With the support of a combined ANOVA model, significant differences in residents&apos; preferences were found for distinct types of regeneration with regards to the cities&apos; character, the location of brownfields within the city and residents&apos; proximity.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities

Popis výsledku anglicky

Residents&apos; preferences are one of the factors in deciding how brownfields should be revitalized. We compare the views of residents in a city with many brownfields (Karvina) with those in a city with only few brownfields (Ceske Budejovice). We assessed the preferences of residents for four global regeneration alternatives (refurbishment, demolition, open space, (re)development) in three different areas of a city (city centre, inner city, city outskirts). A one percent population sample of two post-socialistic cities in the Czech Republic, was used for the comparison. Positive preferences towards brownfield regeneration were confirmed. We found spatial differences in preferences between refurbishment and demolition of brownfields in each city area: demolition was preferred for inner city brownfields whereas refurbishment was preferred in the city centre and outskirts. Differences were also identified between the two cities: residents of the brownfield rich city preferred demolition, whereas residents of the city with few brownfields preferred refurbishment. Creating new public open space, for residents&apos; recreation, was given a lower importance within the city centre and a higher significance in outskirts. With the support of a combined ANOVA model, significant differences in residents&apos; preferences were found for distinct types of regeneration with regards to the cities&apos; character, the location of brownfields within the city and residents&apos; proximity.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50702 - Urban studies (planning and development)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Land Use Policy

ISSN

0264-8377

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

76

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

July

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

224-234

Kód UT WoS článku

000435619900023

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85046797993