Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Factors influencing pesticide-biocontrol agent compatibility: A metadata-based review

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F24%3A43908670" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/24:43908670 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60076658:12520/24:43908670

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106204" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106204</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106204" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106204</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Factors influencing pesticide-biocontrol agent compatibility: A metadata-based review

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The complexities of non-target effects of registered pesticides on biocontrol agents (BCAs) hinder the optimization of integrated pest management programs in agriculture. The wealth of literature on BCA-pesticide compatibility allows for the investigation of factors influencing BCA susceptibility and the generalized impacts of different pesticides. We conducted a meta-analysis using 2088 observations from 122 published articles to assess non-target effects on two phytoseiid species (Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis), a parasitoid (Encarsia formosa), and two microbial BCAs (Trichoderma harzianum and Metarhizium anisopliae). We explored the contributions of bioassay factors (exposure duration, temperature, test methods, mode of actions (MOA), and type of pesticide), and simulated effects of compatibility on target pests. MOA groups 21 and 6 were the most harmful to predatory mites and E. formosa, increasing mortality during pesticide-BCA compatibility. Exposure duration, temperature, and test methods were identified as the most influential factors increasing mortality in phytoseiids during pesticide exposure. Insecticides and fungicides were the most represented and harmful groups to BCAs. Although most bioassays were conducted at room temperature, temperatures between 21 and 22 degrees C were the most harmful to phytoseiids and E. formosa during toxicity assays. Exposure durations of 1-3 days (54-85 %) for predators/parasitoids and 1-5 days (&gt;50 %) for microbial BCAs highlight the lack of data on long-term impacts. In assessing pesticide impacts on target pests, pesticides with compatible concentrations above mean LC50 values were more effective. This study not only identified compatibility trends but also highlighted factors responsible for discrepancies in results and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Factors influencing pesticide-biocontrol agent compatibility: A metadata-based review

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The complexities of non-target effects of registered pesticides on biocontrol agents (BCAs) hinder the optimization of integrated pest management programs in agriculture. The wealth of literature on BCA-pesticide compatibility allows for the investigation of factors influencing BCA susceptibility and the generalized impacts of different pesticides. We conducted a meta-analysis using 2088 observations from 122 published articles to assess non-target effects on two phytoseiid species (Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis), a parasitoid (Encarsia formosa), and two microbial BCAs (Trichoderma harzianum and Metarhizium anisopliae). We explored the contributions of bioassay factors (exposure duration, temperature, test methods, mode of actions (MOA), and type of pesticide), and simulated effects of compatibility on target pests. MOA groups 21 and 6 were the most harmful to predatory mites and E. formosa, increasing mortality during pesticide-BCA compatibility. Exposure duration, temperature, and test methods were identified as the most influential factors increasing mortality in phytoseiids during pesticide exposure. Insecticides and fungicides were the most represented and harmful groups to BCAs. Although most bioassays were conducted at room temperature, temperatures between 21 and 22 degrees C were the most harmful to phytoseiids and E. formosa during toxicity assays. Exposure durations of 1-3 days (54-85 %) for predators/parasitoids and 1-5 days (&gt;50 %) for microbial BCAs highlight the lack of data on long-term impacts. In assessing pesticide impacts on target pests, pesticides with compatible concentrations above mean LC50 values were more effective. This study not only identified compatibility trends but also highlighted factors responsible for discrepancies in results and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/QL24020453" target="_blank" >QL24020453: Metody integrované ochrany rostlin v oblasti pěstování zeleniny se zaměřením na měnící se spektrum účinných látek</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

  • ISSN

    0048-3575

  • e-ISSN

    1095-9939

  • Svazek periodika

    206

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    neuvedeno

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    21

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001353735200001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85208063790