The gap in education efficiency among Czech economics faculties
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F26%3A43910134" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/26:43910134 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60076658:12410/26:43910134
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJMIE.2026.150266" target="_blank" >https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJMIE.2026.150266</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2026.150266" target="_blank" >10.1504/IJMIE.2026.150266</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The gap in education efficiency among Czech economics faculties
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We compare the efficiency of education among 17 economics faculties of public universities in the Czech Republic between 2012 and 2021. We apply data envelopment analysis methods and the Malmquist index to identify inefficient faculties. The optimal ratio of teachers to students was revealed to be almost double that of the least efficient faculties, paying twice as many academics to teach the same number of students. Further, we examine whether hiring more academic workers leads to a higher student success rate, but this is not the case. We identify if the inefficiency is caused by the lack of non-academic employees, which is a cause in some faculties. We analyse that facilities mostly fail to adjust to crisis and demographic situations. Our results provide a base for deeper analysis and possible corrections in managing faculties that are lacking. They also identify the faculties that are role models in the education organisation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The gap in education efficiency among Czech economics faculties
Popis výsledku anglicky
We compare the efficiency of education among 17 economics faculties of public universities in the Czech Republic between 2012 and 2021. We apply data envelopment analysis methods and the Malmquist index to identify inefficient faculties. The optimal ratio of teachers to students was revealed to be almost double that of the least efficient faculties, paying twice as many academics to teach the same number of students. Further, we examine whether hiring more academic workers leads to a higher student success rate, but this is not the case. We identify if the inefficiency is caused by the lack of non-academic employees, which is a cause in some faculties. We analyse that facilities mostly fail to adjust to crisis and demographic situations. Our results provide a base for deeper analysis and possible corrections in managing faculties that are lacking. They also identify the faculties that are role models in the education organisation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2026
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Management in Education
ISSN
1750-385X
e-ISSN
1750-3868
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
1-20
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105024202829