Rubio and Suárez: A Comparative Study on the Nature of Entia Rationis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F10%3A43883129" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12260/10:43883129 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Rubio and Suárez: A Comparative Study on the Nature of Entia Rationis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Jesuit philosophers of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries are today almost forgotten, in spite of their great significance at the time. As a contribution to the rediscovery of these philosophers I expose Tractatus de natura entis rationis, which isa part of an influential textbook Logica mexicana (1603) of Antonio Rubio (1548-1615), and make a comparative analysis of this treatise with Metaphysical Disputation 54 of Francisco Suárez. Rubio's treatise consists from seven section, in my paper, however, I focus on only the first three of them: Do Entia rationis exist? (Section I), What is the nature of Entia rationis? (Section II), What kinds of Entia rationis are there? (Section III). The results of my analysis show that from the point of view of content and argumentation Rubio's theory of beings of reason is very similar to Suárez's theory, although Rubio's theory is much simpler. The significance of this, prima facie trivial, result is to be seen against the background of deep an

Název v anglickém jazyce

Rubio and Suárez: A Comparative Study on the Nature of Entia Rationis

Popis výsledku anglicky

Jesuit philosophers of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries are today almost forgotten, in spite of their great significance at the time. As a contribution to the rediscovery of these philosophers I expose Tractatus de natura entis rationis, which isa part of an influential textbook Logica mexicana (1603) of Antonio Rubio (1548-1615), and make a comparative analysis of this treatise with Metaphysical Disputation 54 of Francisco Suárez. Rubio's treatise consists from seven section, in my paper, however, I focus on only the first three of them: Do Entia rationis exist? (Section I), What is the nature of Entia rationis? (Section II), What kinds of Entia rationis are there? (Section III). The results of my analysis show that from the point of view of content and argumentation Rubio's theory of beings of reason is very similar to Suárez's theory, although Rubio's theory is much simpler. The significance of this, prima facie trivial, result is to be seen against the background of deep an

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Bohemia Jesuitica 1556-2006

ISBN

978-80-246-1755-8

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

477-490

Počet stran knihy

615

Název nakladatele

Karolinum

Místo vydání

Praha

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—