KANT ON JUST WAR AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F21%3A43904189" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12260/21:43904189 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2021/0353-57382101105M.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2021/0353-57382101105M.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FID2101105M" target="_blank" >10.2298/FID2101105M</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

KANT ON JUST WAR AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential for understanding and advancing international order. The article aims to posit arguments that confront the claims that Kant was just war theorist. Since that is the most opposed part of Kant’s political philosophy, mostly due to the misleading interpretation of his argumentation, the author presents Kant’s standpoint on the matters of just war and international order and discusses potential ambiguities between Kant’s and his critics’ theories. Furthermore, the consequences of opponents’ arguments considering states of states, world republic and cosmopolitan democracy in contemporary political philosophy are debated. Finally, the possibility of consent between the three model solutions which are arising from the contemporary international order theory and Kant’s position are compared and analysed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

KANT ON JUST WAR AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER

Popis výsledku anglicky

Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential for understanding and advancing international order. The article aims to posit arguments that confront the claims that Kant was just war theorist. Since that is the most opposed part of Kant’s political philosophy, mostly due to the misleading interpretation of his argumentation, the author presents Kant’s standpoint on the matters of just war and international order and discusses potential ambiguities between Kant’s and his critics’ theories. Furthermore, the consequences of opponents’ arguments considering states of states, world republic and cosmopolitan democracy in contemporary political philosophy are debated. Finally, the possibility of consent between the three model solutions which are arising from the contemporary international order theory and Kant’s position are compared and analysed.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Philosophy and Society - Filozofija i Drustvo

ISSN

0353-5738

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

32

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

RS - Srbská republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

105-127

Kód UT WoS článku

000635704100010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—