Suárez and Some Baroque Scotists on the Perceptual Self-Awareness

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F22%3A43905928" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12260/22:43905928 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/77923/4564456560143" target="_blank" >https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/77923/4564456560143</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/ashf.77923" target="_blank" >10.5209/ashf.77923</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Suárez and Some Baroque Scotists on the Perceptual Self-Awareness

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this article the author deals with the topic of perceptual self-awareness, focusing on whether a plausible account of sensory self-perception having exterior sensations as its objects requires sensible species representing these acts. At first Aristotle’s two distinct views from On the Soul and On Sleep and Waking as defining the scholastic status quaestionis are introduced. Then the author presents Francisco Suárez’s, Bartholomeo Mastri’s and Bonaventura Belluto’s, and finally Hugh McCaghwell’s accounts. It is shown, first, that Suárez’s view, which cannot be substantiated by Scotus’s littera, is rejected by Mastri/Belluto and by McCaghwell in one of his conclusions. Second McCaghwell’s second tenet is to be assessed as Suarezian. This shows that Suárez’s philosophy of perception was positively received also by seventeenth-century Scotists.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Suárez and Some Baroque Scotists on the Perceptual Self-Awareness

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this article the author deals with the topic of perceptual self-awareness, focusing on whether a plausible account of sensory self-perception having exterior sensations as its objects requires sensible species representing these acts. At first Aristotle’s two distinct views from On the Soul and On Sleep and Waking as defining the scholastic status quaestionis are introduced. Then the author presents Francisco Suárez’s, Bartholomeo Mastri’s and Bonaventura Belluto’s, and finally Hugh McCaghwell’s accounts. It is shown, first, that Suárez’s view, which cannot be substantiated by Scotus’s littera, is rejected by Mastri/Belluto and by McCaghwell in one of his conclusions. Second McCaghwell’s second tenet is to be assessed as Suarezian. This shows that Suárez’s philosophy of perception was positively received also by seventeenth-century Scotists.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-01710S" target="_blank" >GA20-01710S: Teorie poznání v barokním scotismu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia

ISSN

0211-2337

e-ISSN

1988-2564

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

ES - Španělské království

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

193-202

Kód UT WoS článku

000829968200015

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85131229020